This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci
Impact Factor: 3.476

Inductive reasoning

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract Inductive reasoning entails using existing knowledge or observations to make predictions about novel cases. We review recent findings in research on category‐based induction as well as theoretical models of these results, including similarity‐based models, connectionist networks, an account based on relevance theory, Bayesian models, and other mathematical models. A number of touchstone empirical phenomena that involve taxonomic similarity are described. We also examine phenomena involving more complex background knowledge about premises and conclusions of inductive arguments and the properties referenced. Earlier models are shown to give a good account of similarity‐based phenomena but not knowledge‐based phenomena. Recent models that aim to account for both similarity‐based and knowledge‐based phenomena are reviewed and evaluated. Among the most important new directions in induction research are a focus on induction with uncertain premise categories, the modeling of the relationship between inductive and deductive reasoning, and examination of the neural substrates of induction. A common theme in both the well‐established and emerging lines of induction research is the need to develop well‐articulated and empirically testable formal models of induction. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making

Examples of tree, dimensional and causal structured representations. (Used with permission from Kemp and Tenenbaum.53).

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Two‐dimensional model of reasoning, showing arguments varying in apparent deductive correctness (y‐axis) and consistency with associative knowledge (x‐axis). The dotted line shows the decision boundary for judging whether an argument is deductively valid or invalid. The dashed line shows the decision boundary for judging whether an argument is inductively strong or weak. (Used with permission from Heit and Rotello73).

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Examples of stimuli used by Papadopoulos et al. to compare category‐based reasoning and feature conjunction reasoning for a test item (‘triangle’) whose category membership is uncertain.65.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Deductive reasoning

Browse by Topic

Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts