Dahmann, C, Basler, K. Compartment boundaries: at the edge of development. Trends Genet 1999, 15:320–326.
Kiecker, C, Lumsden, A. Compartments and their boundaries in vertebrate brain development. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:553–564.
Lumsden, A, Keynes, R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 1989, 337:424–428.
Guthrie, S, Butcher, M, Lumsden, A. Patterns of cell division and interkinetic nuclear migration in the chick embryo hindbrain. J Neurobiol 1991, 22:742–754.
Heyman, I, Faissner, A, Lumsden, A. Cell and matrix specialisations of rhombomere boundaries. Dev Dyn 1995, 204:301–315.
Clarke, JD, Lumsden, A. Segmental repetition of neuronal phenotype sets in the chick embryo hindbrain. Development 1993, 118:151–162.
Trevarrow, B, Marks, DL, Kimmel, CB. Organisation of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo. Neuron 1990, 4:669–679.
Chandrasekhar, A. Turning heads: development of vertebrate branchiomotor neurons. Dev Dyn 2004, 229:143–161.
Metcalfe, WK, Mendelson, B, Kimmel, CB. Segmental homologies among reticulospinal neurons in the hindbrain of the zebrafish larvae. J Comp Neurol 1986, 251:147–159.
Cheng, YC, Amoyel, M, Qiu, X, Jiang, YJ, Xu, Q, Wilkinson, DG. Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev Cell 2004, 6:539–550.
Gonzalez‐Quevedo, R, Lee, Y, Poss, KD, Wilkinson, DG. Neuronal regulation of the spatial patterning of neurogenesis. Dev Cell 2010, 18:136–147.
Prince, VE, Moens, CB, Kimmel, CB, Ho, RK. Zebrafish hox genes: expression in the hindbrain region of wild‐type and mutants of the segmentation gene, valentino. Development 1998, 125:393–406.
Chan, J, Mably, JD, Serluca, FC, Chen, JN, Goldstein, NB, Thomas, MC, Cleary, JA, Brennan, C, Fishman, MC, Roberts, TM. Morphogenesis of prechordal plate and notochord requires intact Eph/ephrin B signaling. Dev Biol 2001, 234:470–482.
Xu, Q, Alldus, G, Holder, N, Wilkinson, DG. Expression of truncated Sek‐1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 1995, 121:4005–4016.
Cooke, J, Moens, C, Roth, L, Durbin, L, Shiomi, K, Brennan, C, Kimmel, C, Wilson, S, Holder, N. Eph signalling functions downstream of Val to regulate cell sorting and boundary formation in the caudal hindbrain. Development 2001, 128:571–580.
Tumpel, S, Wiedemann, LM, Krumlauf, R. Hox genes and segmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain. Curr Top Dev Biol 2009, 88:103–137.
Alexander, T, Nolte, C, Krumlauf, R. Hox genes and segmentation of the hindbrain and axial skeleton. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009, 25:431–456.
White, RJ, Schilling, TF. How degrading: Cyp26s in hindbrain development. Dev Dyn 2008, 237:2775–2790.
Marshall, H, Morrison, A, Studer, M, Pöpperl, H, Krumlauf, R. Retinoids and Hox genes. FASEB J 1996, 10:969–978.
Wilkinson, DG, Bhatt, S, Cook, M, Boncinelli, E, Krumlauf, R. Segmental expression of Hox‐2 homeobox‐containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature 1989, 341:405–409.
Hunt, P, Gulisano, M, Cook, M, Sham, M, Faiella, A, Wilkinson, D, Boncinelli, E, Krumlauf, R. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the head. Nature 1991, 353:861–864.
Zhang, L, Radtke, K, Zheng, L, Cai, AQ, Schilling, TF, Nie, Q. Noise drives sharpening of gene expression boundaries in the zebrafish hindbrain. Mol Syst Biol 2012, 8:613.
Irving, C, Nieto, MA, DasGupta, R, Charnay, P, Wilkinson, DG. Progressive spatial restriction of Sek‐1 and Krox‐20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev Biol 1996, 173:26–38.
Cooke, JE, Moens, CB. Boundary formation in the hindbrain: Eph only it were simple. Trends Neurosci 2002, 25:260–267.
Fraser, S, Keynes, R, Lumsden, A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 1990, 344:431–435.
Jimenez‐Guri, E, Udina, F, Colas, JF, Sharpe, J, Padron‐Barthe, L, Torres, M, Pujades, C. Clonal analysis in mice underlines the importance of rhombomeric boundaries in cell movement restriction during hindbrain segmentation. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10112.
Guthrie, S, Prince, V, Lumsden, A. Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. Development 1993, 118:527–538.
Wizenmann, A, Lumsden, A. Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997, 9:448–459.
Guthrie, S, Lumsden, A. Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 1991, 112:221–229.
Nittenberg, R, Patel, K, Joshi, Y, Krumlauf, R, Wilkinson, DG, Brickell, PM, Tickle, C, Clarke, JD. Cell movements, neuronal organisation and gene expression in hindbrains lacking morphological boundaries. Development 1997, 124:2297–2306.
Schilling, TF, Prince, V, Ingham, PW. Plasticity in zebrafish hox expression in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest. Dev Biol 2001, 231:201–216.
Trainor, P, Krumlauf, R. Plasticity in mouse neural crest cells reveals a new patterning role for cranial mesoderm. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2:96–102.
Schneider‐Maunoury, S, Topilko, P, Seitanidou, T, Levi, G, Cohen‐Tannoudji, M, Pournin, S, Babinet, C, Charnay, P. Disruption of Krox‐20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 1993, 75:1199–1214.
Giudicelli, F, Taillebourg, E, Charnay, P, Gilardi‐Hebenstreit, P. Krox‐20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell‐autonomous and non cell‐autonomous mechanisms. Genes Dev 2001, 15:567–580.
Voiculescu, O, Taillebourg, E, Pujades, C, Kress, C, Buart, S, Charnay, P, Schneider‐Maunoury, S. Hindbrain patterning: Krox20 couples segmentation and specification of regional identity. Development 2001, 128:4967–4978.
Theil, T, Frain, M, Gilardi‐Hebenstreit, P, Flenniken, A, Charnay, P, Wilkinson, DG. Segmental expression of the EphA4 (Sek‐1) receptor tyrosine kinase in the hindbrain is under direct transcriptional control of Krox‐20. Development 1998, 125:443–452.
Cooke, JE, Kemp, HA, Moens, CB. EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere‐boundary formation in the zebrafish. Curr Biol 2005, 15:536–542.
Batlle, E, Wilkinson, DG. Molecular mechanisms of cell segregation and boundary formation in development and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012, 4: a008227.
Dahmann, C, Oates, AC, Brand, M. Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:43–55.
Barone, V, Heisenberg, CP. Cell adhesion in embryo morphogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:148–153.
Gale, NW, Holland, SJ, Valenzuela, DM, Flenniken, A, Pan, L, Ryan, TE, Henkemeyer, M, Strebhardt, K, Hirai, H, Wilkinson, DG, et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 1996, 17:9–19.
Davis, S, Gale, NW, Aldrich, TH, Maisonpierre, PC, Lhotak, V, Pawson, T, Goldfarb, M, Yancopoulos, GD. Ligands for EPH‐related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 1994, 266:816–819.
Egea, J, Klein, R. Bidirectional Eph‐ephrin signaling during axon guidance. Trends Cell Biol 2007, 17:230–238.
Himanen, JP. Ectodomain structures of Eph receptors. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2012, 23:35–42.
Pasquale, EB. Eph‐ephrin bidirectional signaling in physiology and disease. Cell 2008, 133:38–52.
Davy, A, Soriano, P. Ephrin signaling in vivo: look both ways. Dev Dyn 2005, 232:1–10.
Bonanomi, D, Chivatakarn, O, Bai, G, Abdesselem, H, Lettieri, K, Marquardt, T, Pierchala, BA, Pfaff, SL. Ret is a multifunctional coreceptor that integrates diffusible‐ and contact‐axon guidance signals. Cell 2012, 148:568–582.
Lim, YS, McLaughlin, T, Sung, TC, Santiago, A, Lee, KF, O`Leary, DD. p75(NTR) mediates ephrin‐A reverse signaling required for axon repulsion and mapping. Neuron 2008, 59:746–758.
Marler, KJ, Becker‐Barroso, E, Martinez, A, Llovera, M, Wentzel, C, Poopalasundaram, S, Hindges, R, Soriano, E, Comella, J, Drescher, U. A TrkB/EphrinA interaction controls retinal axon branching and synaptogenesis. J. Neuroscience 2008, 28:12700–12712.
Poliakov, A, Cotrina, M, Wilkinson, DG. Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly. Dev Cell 2004, 7:465–480.
Nievergall, E, Lackmann, M, Janes, PW. Eph‐dependent cell‐cell adhesion and segregation in development and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012, 69:1813–1842.
Jorgensen, C, Sherman, A, Chen, GI, Pasculescu, A, Poliakov, A, Hsiung, M, Larsen, B, Wilkinson, DG, Linding, R, Pawson, T. Cell‐specific information processing in segregating populations of Eph receptor ephrin‐expressing cells. Science 2009, 326:1502–1509.
Pasquale, EB. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6:462–475.
Astin, JW, Batson, J, Kadir, S, Charlet, J, Persad, RA, Gillatt, D, Oxley, JD, Nobes, CD. Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:1194–1204.
Hattori, M, Osterfield, M, Flanagan, JG. Regulated cleavage of a contact‐mediated axon repellent. Science 2000, 289:1360–1365.
Janes, PW, Wimmer‐Kleikamp, SH, Frangakis, AS, Treble, K, Griesshaber, B, Sabet, O, Grabenbauer, M, Ting, AY, Saftig, P, Bastiaens, PI, et al. Cytoplasmic relaxation of active Eph controls ephrin shedding by ADAM10. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e1000215.
Zimmer, M, Palmer, A, Kohler, J, Klein, R. EphB‐ephrinB bi‐directional endocytosis terminates adhesion allowing contact mediated repulsion. Nat Cell Biol 2003, 5:869–878.
Marston, DJ, Dickinson, S, Nobes, CD. Ra‐dependent trans‐endocytosis of ephrinBs regulates Eph‐ephrin contact repulsion. Nat Cell Biol 2003, 5:879–888.
Mellitzer, G, Xu, Q, Wilkinson, DG. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 1999, 400:77–81.
Tanaka, M, Kamo, T, Ota, S, Sugimura, H. Association of Dishevelled with Eph tyrosine kinase receptor and ephrin mediates cell repulsion. EMBO J 2003, 22:847–858.
Cortina, C, Palomo‐Ponce, S, Iglesias, M, Fernandez‐Masip, JL, Vivancos, A, Whissell, G, Huma, M, Peiro, N, Gallego, L, Jonkheer, S, et al. EphB‐ephrin‐B interactions suppress colorectal cancer progression by compartmentalizing tumor cells. Nat Genet 2007, 39:1376–1383.
Poliakov, A, Cotrina, ML, Pasini, A, Wilkinson, DG. Regulation of EphB2 activation and cell repulsion by feedback control of the MAPK pathway. J Cell Biol 2008, 183:933–947.
Sobieszczuk, DF, Wilkinson, DG. Masking of Eph receptors and ephrins. Curr Biol 1999, 9:R469–R470.
Carvalho, RF, Beutler, M, Marler, KJ, Knoll, B, Becker‐Barroso, E, Heintzmann, R, Ng, T, Drescher, U. Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:322–330.
Yin, Y, Yamashita, Y, Noda, H, Okafuji, T, Go, MJ, Tanaka, H. EphA receptor tyrosine kinases interact with co‐expressed ephrin‐A ligands in cis. Neurosci Res 2004, 48:285–296.
Rohani, N, Canty, L, Luu, O, Fagotto, F, Winklbauer, R. EphrinB/EphB signaling controls embryonic germ layer separation by contact‐induced cell detachment. PLoS Biol 2011, 9:e1000597.
Xu, Q, Mellitzer, G, Wilkinson, DG. Roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in segmental patterning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000, 355:993–1002.
Xu, Q, Mellitzer, G, Robinson, V, Wilkinson, DG. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 1999, 399:267–271.
Nonchev, S, Maconochie, M, Vesque, C, Aparicio, S, Ariza‐McNaughton, L, Manzanares, M, Maruthainar, K, Kuroiwa, A, Brenner, S, Charnay, P, et al. The conserved role of Krox‐20 in directing Hox gene expression during vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:9339–9345.
Kemp, HA, Cooke, JE, Moens, CB. EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel. Dev Biol 2009, 327:313–326.
Steinberg, MS. Does differential adhesion govern self‐assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J Exp Zool 1970, 173:395–433.
Lecuit, T, Lenne, PF. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:633–644.
Winklbauer, R. Cell adhesion in amphibian gastrulation. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2009, 278:215–275.
Solanas, G, Cortina, C, Sevillano, M, Batlle, E. Cleavage of E‐cadherin by ADAM10 mediates epithelial cell sorting downstream of EphB signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2011, 13:1100–1107.
Batlle, E, Henderson, JT, Beghtel, H, van den Born, MM, Sancho, E, Huls, G, Meeldijk, J, Robertson, J, van de Wetering, M, Pawson, T, et al. β‐catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the intestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/ephrinB. Cell 2002, 111:251–263.
Holmberg, J, Clarke, DL, Frisen, J. Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor. Nature 2000, 408:203–206.
Dravis, C, Yokoyama, N, Chumley, MJ, Cowan, CA, Silvany, RE, Shay, J, Baker, LA, Henkemeyer, M. Bidirectional signaling mediated by ephrin‐B2 and EphB2 controls urorectal development. Dev Biol 2004, 271:272–290.
Lee, HS, Nishanian, TG, Mood, K, Bong, YS, Daar, IO. EphrinB1 controls cell‐cell junctions through the Par polarity complex. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:979–986.
Hansen, MJ, Dallal, GE, Flanagan, JG. Retinal axon response to ephrin‐As shows a graded, concentration‐dependent transition from growth promotion to inhibition. Neuron 2004, 42:717–730.
Abercrombie, M. Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 1979, 281:259–262.
Foty, RA, Steinberg, MS. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev Biol 2005, 278:255–263.
Ninomiya, H, David, R, Damm, EW, Fagotto, F, Niessen, CM, Winklbauer, R. Cadherin‐dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro but not in the embryo. J Cell Sci 2012, 125:1877–1883.
Maitre, JL, Berthoumieux, H, Krens, SF, Salbreux, G, Julicher, F, Paluch, E, Heisenberg, CP. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 2012, 338:253–256.
Taylor, WR, Morley, R, Krasavin, A, Gregory, L, Wilkinson, DG, Poliakov, A. A mechanical model of cell segregation driven by differential adhesion. PLoS One 2012, 7:e43226.
Terriente, J, Gerety, SS, Watanabe‐Asaka, T, Gonzalez‐Quevedo, R, Wilkinson, DG. Signalling from hindbrain boundaries regulates neuronal clustering that patterns neurogenesis. Development 2012, 139:2978–2987.
Gerety, SS, Wilkinson, DG. Morpholino artifacts provide pitfalls and reveal a novel role for pro‐apoptotic genes in hindbrain boundary development. Dev Biol 2011, 350:279–289.
Baek, JH, Hatakeyama, J, Sakamoto, S, Ohtsuka, T, Kageyama, R. Persistent and high levels of Hes1 expression regulate boundary formation in the developing central nervous system. Development 2006, 133:2467–2476.
Qiu, X, Lim, CH, Ho, SH, Lee, KH, Jiang, YJ. Temporal Notch activation through Notch1a and Notch3 is required for maintaining zebrafish rhombomere boundaries. Dev Genes Evol 2009, 219:339–351.
Sela‐Donenfeld, D, Kayam, G, Wilkinson, DG. Boundary cells regulate a switch in the expression of FGF3 in hindbrain rhombomeres. BMC Dev Biol 2009, 9:16.
Weisinger, K, Kohl, A, Kayam, G, Monsonego‐Ornan, E, Sela‐Donenfeld, , D. Expression of hindbrain boundary markers is regulated by FGF3. Biol Open 2011, 1:67–74.