This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.
Impact Factor: 3.803

Performance of small‐scale straw‐to‐heat supply chains in Norway

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Straw can become an important contributor to the biomass feedstocks of Europe and North America. In Norway, between 12 and 17% of a national target to increase the renewable energy share by 14 TWh can be sustainably met by mobilizing straw feedstocks. However, straw must compete in an energy market with a vast availability of forest‐based woody biomass, and a clean electrical energy pool, 95% of which is derived from hydropower. The performance of seven local straw supply chains was monitored over a period of 3 years to estimate straw yields, supply costs, operating costs of the heating plants, and to synthesiz experiences on supply solutions. Storage facilities for bales constituted the largest single cost in the supply chain. Square bales were both more economical to use and required considerably less plant management time, making them more preferable than round bales for small‐scale utilization. The total cost of straw firing averaged out in the range of 36–42 € MWh−1, which is 40–46% of the current cost of electric heating (∼90 € MWh−1). The positive economic outcome provides a good incentive to roll out many more similar plants although heat pumps could be expected to reduce the margin in some applications. WIREs Energy Environ 2014, 3:400–407. doi: 10.1002/wene.107 This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Systems and Infrastructure
Illustration of how the unit costs accrue through the supply chain
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Time consumption for firing, sweeping, and ash removal per MWh, grouped by plant technology and straw storage conditions.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Nomogram illustrating how storage cost (per ton) is related to investment, rate of interest, packing density (utilization), and bale density. At a given investment (1) and rate (2) it provides the annual capital cost per gross storage volume. At a given space utilization level (3), i.e., net bale volume compared with gross storage volume, and bale density (4), the capital cost per ton dry material can be read (5).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Cost of transport and piling of round bales.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Bioenergy > Systems and Infrastructure

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts