How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.

Impact Factor: 3.297

A review and perspective of efficient hydrogen generation via solar thermal water splitting

Advanced Review

Christopher L. Muhich, Brian D. Ehrhart, Ibraheam Al‐Shankiti, Barbara J. Ward, Charles B. Musgrave, Alan W. Weimer

Published Online: May 21 2015

DOI: 10.1002/wene.174

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Solar thermal water splitting (STWS) produces renewable hydrogen from water using concentrated sunlight. Because it utilizes energy from the entire solar spectrum to directly drive the redox reactions that split water, it can achieve high theoretical solar‐to‐hydrogen efficiencies. In two‐step STWS, a metal oxide is first heated by concentrated sunlight to high temperatures to reduce it and produce O2. In the second step, the reduced material is exposed to H2O to reoxidize it to its original oxidation state and produce H2. Various aspects of this process are reviewed in this work, including the reduction and oxidation chemistries of the active redox materials, the effects of operating conditions, and the solar thermal reactors in which the STWS reactions occur, and a perspective is given on the future optimization of STWS. WIREs Energy Environ 2016, 5:261–287. doi: 10.1002/wene.174 This article is categorized under: Concentrating Solar Power > Science and Materials Energy and Climate > Science and Materials Energy Research & Innovation > Science and Materials

Particle based solar thermal water splitting reactor concepts: (a) rotating cavity particle reactor, reprinted from Ref with permission from Elsevier. (b) Nonrotating particle flow reactor, reprinted from Ref with permission from Elsevier. (c) aerosol flow reactor, reprinted with permission of Ref . Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. (d) Internally circulating fluidized bed reactor, Reprinted from with permission ASME. (e) moving particle packed bed reactor. Reprinted from with permission ASME. The labels in (a) point out: (1) rotating drum, (2) actuation, (3) aperture, (4) cavity, (5) screw feeder, (6) product outlet port, (7) rotary joint, (8) working fluids, (9) insulation, (10) quartz window and labels in (b) point out: (1) water‐cooled window mount and vortex‐flow generation, (2) water‐cooled cavity aperture, (3) BOP and data‐acquisition cavity access ports, (4) alumina‐tile reaction surface, (5) annular solid ZnO exit, (6) bulk insulation and cavity‐shape support, (7) central product‐vapor and gas exit.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Monolith‐based solar thermal water splitting reactor concepts: (a) the porous monolith cavity reactor, from Ref reprinted with permission from AAAS; (b) the rotating piston reactor, reproduced by permission of John Wiley and Sons; (c) the CR5, reproduced with permission of Sandia Corporation, copyright 2012 and (d) the SurroundSun reactor, reprinted from Ref with permission from Elsevier.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Process diagram from Lapp et al., and Ermanoski et al.. (a) Reprinted from Energy 37, Lapp et al., ‘Efficiency of two‐step solar thermochemical nonstoichiometric redox cycles with heat recovery’, Copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier. (b) Reproduced from Ermanoski et al., with permission from the PCCP Owner Societies.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Three different methods to achieve low P_O2 of oxygen and the associated energy requirements: (a) vacuum pumping, (b) direct inert gas sweep, and (c) recycled inert gas sweep.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

(a) Perovskite based solar thermal water splitting cycles. SLMA materials are capable of producing significantly more H₂ than ceria when reduced at 1350°C and oxidized at 1000°C. This figure is reproduced under the creative commons license. (b) Many other perovskite formulations have shown to be capable of undergoing STWS. From left to right are the H₂ production capacities of Ba_0.25Sr_0.75Co_0.80Fe_0.20O₃, Ba_0.50Sr_0.50Co_0.80Fe_0.20O₃, La_0.60Sr_0.40Co_0.20Fe_0.80O₃, LaSrCoO₃, La_0.65Sr_0.35MnO₃, La_0.50Sr_0.50MnO₃, and La_0.50Sr_0.50MnO₃ under operating conditions shown in the inset. Reprinted from Ref , copyright 2014, with permission from the American Chemical Society.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Ceria‐based solar thermal water splitting cycles. (a) H₂ and O₂ production rates using a cavity reactor, (b) H₂ and O₂ production over 500 cycles using the cavity reactor, cycled at 1500/800°C with a P_O2 = 10⁻⁵ atm and P_H2O = 0.13–0.15 atm. From Ref reprinted with permission from AAAS. (c) and (d) show the reduction and oxidation reaction extents of doped ceria as measured by TGA experiments under 1500/800°C, P_O2 = 10⁻⁴ atm and P_H2O = 0.4 atm operating conditions. Reprinted from Ref , copyright 2013 with permission from the American Chemical Society.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Thermodynamic extent of oxygen nonstoichiometry (δ) of ceria, based on temperature and partial pressure of oxygen. Reprinted from Energy 37, Lapp et al., ‘Efficiency of two‐step solar thermochemical nonstoichiometric redox cycles with heat recovery’, copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

The newly proposed solar thermal particle flow reactor. (a) An individual reduction/oxidation reactor unit and (b) receiver configuration containing multiple individual reduction/oxidation reactor units. Reactors are not shown to scale.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

(a) The doped‐hercynite cycle H₂ production rates after reduction at various temperatures and oxidation at 1000°C. (b) The doped‐hercynite cycle H₂ production rates of CoFe₂O₄ on ZrO₂ after reduction and oxidation under the same conditions as (a). Reproduced by permission of The International Association of H₂ Energy. (c) shows the H₂ production rates of doped‐hercynite operating under temperature swing water splitting conditions (left two peaks) and isothermal water splitting conditions (right peak). Reproduced from Science 2013 with permission from the AAAS.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Thermodynamic predictions of the reduction of MFe₂O₄ where M = Fe, Co, Ni or Zn. Figure (a) shows the simulated MFe₂O₄ (blue) and O content (red) while (b) shows the reduced metal oxide content in a solid (orange), liquid (black), or gas (green) phase. Reprinted from Ref , copyright 2008, with permission from the American Chemical Society.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

A comparison of the reduced Zn and SnO recovery after thermal ZnO and SnO₂ decomposition using the same experimental apparatus and conditions. Reproduced from Ref by permission of Elsevier.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Methods of concentrating solar irradiance using (a) power tower and heliostats and (b) a parabolic dish concentrator. Reprinted under the creative commons license. (c) A schematic of a generic two‐step solar thermal water splitting cycle.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

A ‘beam‐up’ receiver configuration (left) and the solar field design sounding the tower at a latitude of 34.5°N. Reprinted from Ref with permission ASME.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Simpson, AP, Lutz, AE. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via steam methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:4811–4820.
Barreto, L, Makihira, A, Riahi, K. The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28:267–284.
Ogden, JM. Prospects for building a hydrogen energy infrastructure. Annu Rev Energy Environ 1999, 24:227–279.
Marbán, G, Valdés‐Solís, T. Towards the hydrogen economy? Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:1625–1637.
Steinfeld, A. Solar thermochemical production of hydrogen––a review. Solar Energy 2005, 78:603–615.
Perkins, C, Weimer, AW. Solar‐thermal production of renewable hydrogen. AICHE J 2009, 55:286–293.
Holladay, JD, Hu, J, King, DL, Wang, Y. An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 2009, 139:244–260.
Zou, Z, Ye, J, Sayama, K, Arakawa, H. Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst. Nature 2001, 414:625–627.
Lewis, NS, Nocera, DG. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006, 103:15729–15735.
Siegel, NP, Miller, JE, Ermanoski, I, Diver, RB, Stechel, EB. Factors affecting the efficiency of solar driven metal oxide thermochemical cycles. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52:3276–3286.
Roeb, M, Neises, M, Monnerie, N, Call, F, Simon, H, Sattler, C, Schmücker, M, Pitz‐Paal, R. Materials‐related aspects of thermochemical water and carbon dioxide splitting: a review. Materials 2012, 5:2015–2054.
Perkins, C, Weimer, AW. Likely near‐term solar‐thermal water splitting technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2004, 29:1587–1599.
Abanades, S, Charvin, P, Flamant, G, Neveu, P. Screening of water‐splitting thermochemical cycles potentially attractive for hydrogen production by concentrated solar energy. Energy 2006, 31:2805–2822.
Scheffe, JR, Steinfeld, A. Oxygen exchange materials for solar thermochemical splitting of H₂O and CO₂: a review. Mater Today 2014, 17:341–348.
Naterer, GF, Gabriel, K, Wang, ZL, Daggupati, VN, Gravelsins, R. Thermochemical hydrogen production with a copper‐chlorine cycle. I: oxygen release from copper oxychloride decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:5439–5450.
Naterer, G, Suppiah, S, Lewis, M, Gabriel, K, Dincer, I, Rosen, MA, Fowler, M, Rizvi, G, Easton, EB, Ikeda, BM, et al. Recent Canadian advances in nuclear‐based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu‐Cl cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:2901–2917.
Kasahara, S, Kubo, S, Hino, R, Onuki, K, Nomura, M, Nakao, S. Flowsheet study of the thermochemical water‐splitting iodine‐sulfur process for effective hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:489–496.
Yildiz, B, Kazimi, MS. Efficiency of hydrogen production systems using alternative nuclear energy technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31:77–92.
Nakamura, N, Miyaoka, H, Ichikawa, T, Kojima, Y. Hydrogen production via thermochemical water‐splitting by lithium redox reaction. J Alloys Compd 2013, 580:S410–S413.
Marugán, J, Botas, JA, Martín, M, Molina, R, Herradón, C. Study of the first step of the Mn₂O₃/MnO thermochemical cycle for solar hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:7017–7025.
Kreider, PB, Funke, HH, Cuche, K, Schmidt, M, Steinfeld, A, Weimer, AW. Manganese oxide based thermochemical hydrogen production cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:7028–7037.
Francis, TM, Lichty, PR, Weimer, AW. Manganese oxide dissociation kinetics for the Mn₂O₃ thermochemical water‐splitting cycle. Part 1: experimental. Chem Eng Sci 2010, 65:3709–3717.
Chueh, WC, Falter, C, Abbott, M, Scipio, D, Furler, P, Haile, SM, Steinfeld, A. High‐flux solar‐driven thermochemical dissociation of CO₂ and H₂O using nonstoichiometric ceria. Science 2010, 330:1797–1801.
Meredig, B, Wolverton, C. First‐principles thermodynamic framework for the evaluation of thermochemical H₂O or CO₂ splitting materials. Phys Rev B 2009, 80:245119.
Miller, JE, McDaniel, AH, Allendorf, MD. Considerations in the design of materials for solar‐driven fuel production using metal‐oxide thermochemical cycles. Adv Energy Mater 2014, 4:1300469.
Nakamura, T. Hydrogen production from water utilizing solar heat at high temperatures. Solar Energy 1977, 19:467–475.
Diver, RB, Miller, JE, Allendorf, MD, Siegel, NP, Hogan, RE. Solar thermochemical water‐splitting ferrite‐cycle heat engines. J Solar Energy Eng 2008, 130:041001.
Chueh, WC, Haile, SM. A thermochemical study of ceria: exploiting an old material for new modes of energy conversion and CO₂ mitigation. Philos Trans Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 2010, 368:3269–3294.
Lapp, J, Davidson, JH, Lipiński, W. Efficiency of two‐step solar thermochemical non‐stoichiometric redox cycles with heat recovery. Energy 2012, 37:591–600.
Scheffe, JR, Steinfeld, A. Thermodynamic analysis of cerium‐based oxides for solar thermochemical fuel production. Energy Fuel 2012, 26:1928–1936.
Muhich, CL, Evanko, BW, Weston, KC, Lichty, P, Liang, X, Martinek, J, Musgrave, CB, Weimer, AW. Efficient generation of H₂ by splitting water with an isothermal redox cycle. Science 2013, 341:540–542.
Hao, Y, Yang, C‐K, Haile, SM. High‐temperature isothermal chemical cycling for solar‐driven fuel production. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013, 15:17084–17092.
Bader, R, Venstrom, LJ, Davidson, JH, Lipiński, W. Thermodynamic analysis of isothermal redox cycling of ceria for solar fuel production. Energy Fuel 2013, 27:5533–5544.
Venstrom, LJ, De Smith, RM, Hao, Y, Haile, SM, Davidson, JH. Efficient splitting of CO₂ in an isothermal redox cycle based on ceria. Energy Fuel 2014, 28:2732–2742.
Krenzke, PT, Davidson, JH. Thermodynamic analysis of syngas production via the solar thermochemical cerium oxide redox cycle with methane‐driven reduction. Energy Fuel 2014, 28:4088–4095.
Lundberg, M. Model calculations on some feasible two‐step water splitting processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 1993, 18:369–376.
Kodama, T, Gokon, N. Thermochemical cycles for high‐temperature solar hydrogen production. Chem Rev 2007, 107:4048–4077.
Steinfeld, A. Solar hydrogen production via a two‐step water‐splitting thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27:611–619.
Kaneko, H, Miura, T, Ishihara, H, Taku, S, Yokoyama, T, Nakajima, H, Tamaura, Y. Reactive ceramics of CeO₂–MO_x (M = Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu) for H₂ generation by two‐step water splitting using concentrated solar thermal energy. Energy 2007, 32:656–663.
Abanades, S, Charvin, P, Lemont, F, Flamant, G. Novel two‐step SnO₂/SnO water‐splitting cycle for solar thermochemical production of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:6021–6030.
Loutzenhiser, PG, Meier, A, Steinfeld, A. Review of the two‐step H₂O/CO₂‐splitting solar thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions. Materials 2010, 3:4922–4938.
Weidenkaff, A, Reller, A, Wokaun, A, Steinfeld, A. Thermogravimetric analysis of the ZnO/Zn water splitting cycle. Thermochim Acta 2000, 359:69–75.
Levêque, G, Abanades, S. Kinetic analysis of high‐temperature solid–gas reactions by an inverse method applied to ZnO and SnO₂ solar thermal dissociation. Chem Eng J 2013, 217:139–149.
Charvin, P, Abanades, S, Lemont, F, Flamant, G. Experimental study of SnO₂/SnO/Sn thermochemical systems for solar production of hydrogen. AICHE J 2008, 54:2759–2767.
Schunk, LO, Steinfeld, A. Kinetics of the thermal dissociation of ZnO exposed to concentrated solar irradiation using a solar‐driven thermogravimeter in the 1800–2100 K range. AICHE J 2009, 55:1497–1504.
Perkins, C, Lichty, P, Weimer, AW. Determination of aerosol kinetics of thermal ZnO dissociation by thermogravimetry. Chem Eng Sci 2007, 62:5952–5962.
Chambon, M, Abanades, S, Flamant, G. Solar thermal reduction of ZnO and SnO₂: characterization of the recombination reaction with O₂. Chem Eng Sci 2010, 65:3671–3680.
Gstoehl, D, Brambilla, A, Schunk, LO, Steinfeld, A. A quenching apparatus for the gaseous products of the solar thermal dissociation of ZnO. J Mater Sci 2008, 43:4729–4736.
Berman, A, Epstein, M. The kinetics of hydrogen production in the oxidation of liquid zinc with water vapor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2000, 25:957–967.
Yang, W, Han, Z, Zhou, J, Liu, J, Cen, K. Quantum chemical calculations on the reaction of zinc and water in gas phase. Combust Sci Technol 2013, 186:24–33.
Melchior, T, Piatkowski, N, Steinfeld, A. H₂ production by steam‐quenching of Zn vapor in a hot‐wall aerosol flow reactor. Chem Eng Sci 2009, 64:1095–1101.
Abu Hamed, T, Davidson, JH, Stolzenburg, M. Hydrolysis of evaporated Zn in a hot wall flow reactor. J Solar Energy Eng 2008, 130:041010.
Venstrom, LJ, Davidson, JH. The kinetics of the heterogeneous oxidation of zinc vapor by carbon dioxide. Chem Eng Sci 2013, 93:163–172.
Levêque, G, Abanades, S, Jumas, J‐C, Olivier‐Fourcade, J. Characterization of two‐step tin‐based redox system for thermochemical fuel production from solar‐driven CO₂ and H₂O splitting cycle. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014, 53:5668–5677.
Vishnevetsky, I, Epstein, M. Tin as a possible candidate for solar thermochemical redox process for hydrogen production. J Solar Energy Eng 2009, 131:021007.
Chambon, M, Abanades, S, Flamant, G. Kinetic investigation of hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of SnO and Zn solar nanopowders. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:5326–5336.
Abanades, S. CO₂ and H₂O reduction by solar thermochemical looping using SnO₂/SnO redox reactions: thermogravimetric analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:8223–8231.
Steinfeld, A, Sanders, S, Palumbo, R. Design aspects of solar thermochemical engineering—a case study: two‐step water‐splitting cycle using the FE₃O₄/FeO redox system. Solar Energy 1999, 65:43–53.
Lichty, P, Liang, X, Muhich, C, Evanko, B, Bingham, C, Weimer, AW. Atomic layer deposited thin film metal oxides for fuel production in a solar cavity reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:16888–16894.
Coker, EN, Ohlhausen, JA, Ambrosini, A, Miller, JE. Oxygen transport and isotopic exchange in iron oxide/YSZ thermochemically‐active materials via splitting of C(¹⁸O)₂ at high temperature studied by thermogravimetric analysis and secondary ion mass spectrometry. J Mater Chem 2012, 22:6726–6732.
Charvin, P, Abanades, S, Flamant, G, Lemort, F. Two‐step water splitting thermochemical cycle based on iron oxide redox pair for solar hydrogen production. Energy 2007, 32:1124–1133.
Allen, KM, Mehdizadeh, AM, Klausner, JF, Coker, EN. Study of a magnetically stabilized porous structure for thermochemical water splitting via TGA, high‐temperature‐XRD, and SEM analyses. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013, 52:3683–3692.
Kodama, T, Nakamuro, Y, Mizuno, T. A two‐step thermochemical water splitting by iron‐oxide on stabilized zirconia. J Solar Energy Eng 2004, 128:3–7.
Kaneko, H, Kodama, T, Gokon, N, Tamaura, Y, Lovegrove, K, Luzzi, A. Decomposition of Zn‐ferrite for O₂ generation by concentrated solar radiation. Solar Energy 2004, 76:317–322.
Ehrensberger, K, Frei, A, Kuhn, P, Oswald, HR, Hug, P. Comparative experimental investigations of the water‐splitting reaction with iron oxide Fe_1 − yO and iron manganese oxides (Fe_1 − xMn_x)_1 − yO. Solid State Ion 1995, 78:151–160.
Allendorf, MD, Diver, RB, Siegel, NP, Miller, JE. Two‐step water splitting using mixed‐metal ferrites: thermodynamic analysis and characterization of synthesized materials. Energy Fuel 2008, 22:4115–4124.
Bhosale, R, Khadka, R, Puszynski, J, Shende, R. H₂ generation from two‐step thermochemical water‐splitting reaction using sol–gel derived Sn_xFe_yO_z. J Renew Sustain Energy 2011, 3:063104.
Kodama, T, Kondoh, Y, Yamamoto, R, Andou, H, Satou, N. Thermochemical hydrogen production by a redox system of ZrO₂‐supported Co(II)‐ferrite. Solar Energy 2005, 78:623–631.
Tamaura, Y, Steinfeld, A, Kuhn, P, Ehrensberger, K. Production of solar hydrogen by a novel, 2‐step, water‐splitting thermochemical cycle. Energy 1995, 20:325–330.
Ishihara, H, Kaneko, H, Yokoyama, T, Fuse, A, Hasegawa, N, Tamaura, Y. Hydrogen production through two‐step water splitting using YSZ (Ni, Fe) system for solar hydrogen production. In: ASME 2005 International Solar Energy Conference: Orlando, FL, 2005.
Ishihara, H, Kaneko, H, Hasegawa, N, Tamaura, Y. Two‐step water splitting process with solid solution of YSZ and Ni‐ferrite for solar hydrogen production (ISEC 2005–76151). J Solar Energy Eng 2008, 130:044501.
Scheffe, JR, Li, JH, Weimer, AW. A spinel ferrite/hercynite water‐splitting redox cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:3333–3340.
Arifin, D, Aston, VJ, Liang, XH, McDaniel, AH, Weimer, AW. CoFe₂O₄ on a porous Al₂O₃ nanostructure for solar thermochemical CO₂ splitting. Energy Environ Sci 2012, 5:9438–9443.
Muhich, CL, Weston, KC, Arifin, D, McDaniel, AH, Musgrave, CB, Weimer, AW. Extracting kinetic information from complex gas–solid reaction data. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014. doi:10.1021/ie503894f.
Abanades, S, Flamant, G. Thermochemical hydrogen production from a two‐step solar‐driven water‐splitting cycle based on cerium oxides. Solar Energy 2006, 80:1611–1623.
Kaneko, H, Ishihara, H, Taku, S, Naganuma, Y, Hasegawa, N, Tamaura, Y. Cerium ion redox system in CeO₂–xFe₂O₃ solid solution at high temperatures (1273–1673 K) in the two‐step water‐splitting reaction for solar H₂ generation. J Mater Sci 2008, 43:3153–3161.
Furler, P, Scheffe, J, Marxer, D, Gorbar, M, Bonk, A, Vogt, U, Steinfeld, A. Thermochemical CO₂ splitting via redox cycling of ceria reticulated foam structures with dual‐scale porosities. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014, 16:10503–10511.
Scheffe, JR, Jacot, R, Patzke, GR, Steinfeld, A. Synthesis, characterization, and thermochemical redox performance of Hf⁴⁺, Zr⁴⁺, and Sc³⁺ doped ceria for splitting CO₂. J Phys Chem C 2013, 117:24104–24114.
Abanades, S, Legal, A, Cordier, A, Peraudeau, G, Flamant, G, Julbe, A. Investigation of reactive cerium‐based oxides for H₂ production by thermochemical two‐step water‐splitting. J Mater Sci 2010, 45:4163–4173.
Meng, Q‐L, Lee, C‐i, Ishihara, T, Kaneko, H, Tamaura, Y. Reactivity of CeO₂‐based ceramics for solar hydrogen production via a two‐step water‐splitting cycle with concentrated solar energy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:13435–13441.
Meng, Q‐L, Lee, C‐i, Shigeta, S, Kaneko, H, Tamaura, Y. Solar hydrogen production using Ce_1 − xLi_xO_2 − δ solid solutions via a thermochemical, two‐step water‐splitting cycle. J Solid State Chem 2012, 194:343–351.
Chueh, WC, Haile, SM. Ceria as a thermochemical reaction medium for selectively generating syngas or methane from H₂O and CO₂. Chemsuschem 2009, 2:735–739.
Jiang, Q, Zhou, G, Jiang, Z, Li, C. Thermochemical CO₂ splitting reaction with Ce_xM_1 − xO_2 − δ (M = Ti⁴⁺, Sn⁴⁺, Hf⁴⁺, Zr⁴⁺, La³⁺, Y³⁺ and Sm³⁺) solid solutions. Solar Energy 2014, 99:55–66.
Ramos‐Fernandez, EV, Shiju, NR, Rothenberg, G. Understanding the solar‐driven reduction of CO₂ on doped ceria. RSC Adv 2014, 4:16456–16463.
Le Gal, A, Abanades, S, Bion, N, Le Mercier, T, Harlé, V. Reactivity of doped ceria‐based mixed oxides for solar thermochemical hydrogen generation via two‐step water‐splitting cycles. Energy Fuel 2013, 27:6068–6078.
Le Gal, A, Abanades, S. Dopant incorporation in ceria for enhanced water‐splitting activity during solar thermochemical hydrogen generation. J Phys Chem C 2012, 116:13516–13523.
Le Gal, A, Abanades, S, Flamant, G. CO₂ and H₂O splitting for thermochemical production of solar fuels using nonstoichiometric ceria and ceria/zirconia solid solutions. Energy Fuel 2011, 25:4836–4845.
Scaranto, J, Idriss, H. The effect of uranium cations on the redox properties of CeO₂ within the context of hydrogen production from water. Top Catal 2014, 58:1–6.
Kang, M, Zhang, J, Wang, C, Wang, F, Zhao, N, Xiao, F, Wei, W, Sun, Y. CO₂ splitting via two step thermochemical reactions over doped ceria/zirconia solid solutions. RSC Adv 2013, 3:18878–18885.
Kang, M, Wu, X, Zhang, J, Zhao, N, Wei, W, Sun, Y. Enhanced thermochemical CO₂ splitting over Mg‐ and Ca‐doped ceria/zirconia solid solutions. RSC Adv 2014, 4:5583–5590.
Dasari, HP, Ahn, K, Park, S‐Y, Ji, H‐I, Yoon, KJ, Kim, B‐K, Je, H‐J, Lee, H‐W, Lee, J‐H. Hydrogen production from water‐splitting reaction based on RE‐doped ceria–zirconia solid‐solutions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:6097–6103.
Al‐Shankiti, I, Al‐Otaibi, F, Al‐Salik, Y, Idriss, H. Solar thermal hydrogen production from water over modified CeO₂ materials. Top Catal 2013, 56:1129–1138.
Al‐Salik, Y, Al‐Shankiti, I, Idriss, H. Core level spectroscopy of oxidized and reduced Ce_xU_1 − xO₂ materials. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 2014, 194:66–73.
Nalbandian, L, Evdou, A, Zaspalis, V. La_1 − xSr_xMO₃ (M = Mn, Fe) perovskites as materials for thermochemical hydrogen production in conventional and membrane reactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7162–7172.
Evdou, A, Zaspalis, V, Nalbandian, L. La_1 − xSr_xFeO_3 − δ perovskites as redox materials for application in a membrane reactor for simultaneous production of pure hydrogen and synthesis gas. Fuel 2010, 89:1265–1273.
Scheffe, JR, Weibel, D, Steinfeld, A. Lanthanum–strontium–manganese perovskites as redox materials for solar thermochemical splitting of H₂O and CO₂. Energy Fuel 2013, 27:4250–4257.
McDaniel, AH, Miller, EC, Arifin, D, Ambrosini, A, Coker, EN, O`Hayre, R, Chueh, WC, Tong, JH. Sr‐ and Mn‐doped LaAlO_3–δ for solar thermochemical H₂ and CO production. Energy Environ Sci 2013, 6:2424–2428.
McDaniel, AH, Ambrosini, A, Coker, EN, Miller, JE, Chueh, WC, O`Hayre, R, Tong, J. Nonstoichiometric perovskite oxides for solar thermochemical H₂ and CO production. Energy Procedia 2014, 49:2009–2018.
Demont, A, Abanades, S, Beche, E. Investigation of perovskite structures as oxygen‐exchange redox materials for hydrogen production from thermochemical two‐step water‐splitting cycles. J Phys Chem C 2014, 118:12682–12692.
Yang, C‐K, Yamazaki, Y, Aydin, A, Haile, SM. Thermodynamic and kinetic assessments of strontium‐doped lanthanum manganite perovskites for two‐step thermochemical water splitting. J Mater Chem A 2014, 2:13612–13623.
Deml, AM, Stevanovic, V, Muhich, CL, Musgrave, CB, O`Hayre, R. Oxide enthalpy of formation and band gap energy as accurate descriptors of oxygen vacancy formation energetics. Energy Environ Sci 2014, 7:1996–2004.
Jiang, Q, Tong, J, Zhou, G, Jiang, Z, Li, Z, Li, C. Thermochemical CO₂ splitting reaction with supported La_xA_1−xFe_yB_1−yO₃ (A = Sr, Ce, B = Co, Mn; 0 %3C x, y %3C 1) perovskite oxides. Solar Energy 2014, 103:425–437.
Ermanoski, I, Miller, JE, Allendorf, MD. Efficiency maximization in solar‐thermochemical fuel production: challenging the concept of isothermal water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014, 16:8418–8427.
Lange, M, Roeb, M, Sattler, C, Pitz‐Paal, R. T–S diagram efficiency analysis of two‐step thermochemical cycles for solar water splitting under various process conditions. Energy 2014, 67:298–308.
Ermanoski, I. Cascading pressure thermal reduction for efficient solar fuel production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39:13114–13117.
Ermanoski, I, Siegel, NP, Stechel, EB. A new reactor concept for efficient solar‐thermochemical fuel production. J Solar Energy Eng 2013, 135:031002.
Dyer, PN, Richards, RE, Russek, SL, Taylor, DM. Ion transport membrane technology for oxygen separation and syngas production. Solid State Ion 2000, 134:21–33.
Felinks, J, Brendelberger, S, Roeb, M, Sattler, C, Pitz‐Paal, R. Heat recovery concept for thermochemical processes using a solid heat transfer medium. Appl Therm Eng 2014, 73:1004–1011.
Lapp, J, Davidson, JH, Lipiński, W. Heat transfer analysis of a solid‐solid heat recuperation system for solar‐driven nonstoichiometric redox cycles. J Solar Energy Eng 2013, 135:031004.
Krenzke, PT, Davidson, JH. On the efficiency of solar H₂ and CO production via the thermochemical cerium oxide redox cycle: the option of inert‐swept reduction. Energy Fuel 2015, 29:1045–1054.
Panlener, RJ, Blumenthal, RN, Garnier, JE. A thermodynamic study of nonstoichiometric cerium dioxide. J Phys Chem Solid 1975, 36:1213–1222.
Zinkevich, M, Djurovic, D, Aldinger, F. Thermodynamic modelling of the cerium–oxygen system. Solid State Ion 2006, 177:989–1001.
Roine, A. HSC Thermochemistry 7.0. 2009.
Bale, CW, Chartrand, P, Degterov, SA, Eriksson, G, Hack, K, Ben Mahfoud, R, Melançon, J, Pelton, AD, Petersen, S. FactSage thermochemical software and databases. Calphad 2002, 26:189–228.
Furler, P, Scheffe, JR, Steinfeld, A. Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H₂O and CO₂ via ceria redox reactions in a high‐temperature solar reactor. Energy Environ Sci 2012, 5:6098–6103.
Schunk, LO, Lipiński, W, Steinfeld, A. Heat transfer model of a solar receiver‐reactor for the thermal dissociation of ZnO—experimental validation at 10 kW and scale‐up to 1 MW. Chem Eng J 2009, 150:502–508.
Ehrhart, B, Gill, D. Evaluation of annual efficiencies of high temperature central receiver concentrated solar power plants with thermal energy storage. Energy Procedia 2014, 49:752–761.
Martinek, J, Viger, R, Weimer, AW. Transient simulation of a tubular packed bed solar receiver for hydrogen generation via metal oxide thermochemical cycles. Solar Energy 2014, 105:613–631.
Houaijia, A, Sattler, C, Roeb, M, Lange, M, Breuer, S, Säck, JP. Analysis and improvement of a high‐efficiency solar cavity reactor design for a two‐step thermochemical cycle for solar hydrogen production from water. Solar Energy 2013, 97:26–38.
Agrafiotis, C, Roeb, M, Konstandopoulos, A, Nalbandian, L, Zaspalis, V, Sattler, C, Stobbe, P, Steele, A. Solar water splitting for hydrogen production with monolithic reactors. Solar Energy 2005, 79:409–421.
Roeb, M, Neises, M, Säck, J‐P, Rietbrock, P, Monnerie, N, Dersch, J, Schmitz, M, Sattler, C. Operational strategy of a two‐step thermochemical process for solar hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:4537–4545.
Chambon, M, Abanades, S, Flamant, G. Thermal dissociation of compressed ZnO and SnO₂ powders in a moving‐front solar thermochemical reactor. AICHE J 2011, 57:2264–2273.
Miller, JE, Diver, RB, Siegel, NP, Coker, EN, Ambrosini, A, Rodriguez, MA, Garino, TJ, Dedrick, DE, Johnson, TA, Allendorf, MD, et al. Sunshine to petrol: solar thermochemistry for liquid fuels. Abstr Pap Am Chem Soc 2011, 241:393‐PHYS.
Lichty, P, Perkins, C, Woodruff, B, Bingham, C, Weimer, A. Rapid high temperature solar thermal biomass gasification in a prototype cavity reactor. J Solar Energy Eng 2010, 132:011012.
Martinek, J, Weimer, AW. Design considerations for a multiple tube solar reactor. Solar Energy 2013, 90:68–83.
Melchior, T, Perkins, C, Weimer, AW, Steinfeld, A. A cavity‐receiver containing a tubular absorber for high‐temperature thermochemical processing using concentrated solar energy. Int J Therm Sci 2008, 47:1496–1503.
Miller, JE, Allendorf, MD, Ambrosini, A, Chen, KS, Coker, EN, Dedrick, DE, Diver, RB, Hogan, RE, Ermanoski, I, Johnson, TA, et al. Final Report Reimagining Liquid Transportation Fuels: Sunshine to Petrol. Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND2012-0307, 2012.
Martinek, J, Weimer, AW. Evaluation of finite volume solutions for radiative heat transfer in a closed cavity solar receiver for high temperature solar thermal processes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2013, 58:585–596.
Müller, R, Haeberling, P, Palumbo, RD. Further advances toward the development of a direct heating solar thermal chemical reactor for the thermal dissociation of ZnO(s). Solar Energy 2006, 80:500–511.
Koepf, E, Advani, SG, Steinfeld, A, Prasad, AK. A novel beam‐down, gravity‐fed, solar thermochemical receiver/reactor for direct solid particle decomposition: design, modeling, and experimentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:16871–16887.
Scheffe, JR, Welte, M, Steinfeld, A. Thermal reduction of ceria within an aerosol reactor for H₂O and CO₂ splitting. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014, 53:2175–2182.
Gokon, N, Takahashi, S, Yamamoto, H, Kodama, T. New solar water‐splitting reactor with ferrite particles in an internally circulating fluidized bed. J Solar Energy Eng 2009, 131:011007.
Schunk, LO, Haeberling, P, Wepf, S, Wuillemin, D, Meier, A, Steinfeld, A. A receiver‐reactor for the solar thermal dissociation of zinc oxide. J Solar Energy Eng 2008, 130:021009.
Abanades, S, Charvin, P, Flamant, G. Design and simulation of a solar chemical reactor for the thermal reduction of metal oxides: case study of zinc oxide dissociation. Chem Eng Sci 2007, 62:6323–6333.
Möller, S, Palumbo, R. The development of a solar chemical reactor for the direct thermal dissociation of zinc oxide. J Solar Energy Eng 2000, 123:83–90.
Koepf, EE, Lindemer, MD, Advani, SG, Prasad, AK. Experimental investigation of vortex flow in a two‐chamber solar thermochemical reactor. J Fluids Eng 2013, 135:111103.
Perkins, C, Lichty, PR, Weimer, AW. Thermal ZnO dissociation in a rapid aerosol reactor as part of a solar hydrogen production cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:499–510.
Kunii, D, Levenspiel, O. Fluidization Engineering, vol. 2. Boston, MA: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 1991.
Röger, M, Amsbeck, L, Gobereit, B, Buck, R. Face‐down solid particle receiver using recirculation. J Solar Energy Eng 2011, 133:031009.

Author Notes

This WIREs Energy and Environment article includes this figure from the table of contents:

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts