This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.
Impact Factor: 3.803

Forest bioenergy feedstock harvesting effects on water supply

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract Water flowing from forested catchments, both unmanaged and managed, is highly valued in terms of both quantity and quality. Increasing energy production using wood feedstocks produces varying degrees of impacts and thereby raises concerns about environmental impacts on the highly valued water supply resources of forest ecosystems. The term water supply encompasses both key components of water quantity and water quality. Water quantity considers the amount of increases or decreases, timing, consistency, and relative magnitude of water yields. Plant nutrients (anions and cations), fertilizers, herbicides, ash additions, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, bacteria, and sediment comprise water quality. Within the life cycle of forest bioenergy, operational activities during stand establishment, midrotation silviculture, harvesting, product transportation, wood storage, energy production, and ash recycling create variable levels of impacts. Disturbance levels associated with bioenergy operations depend on their type, intensity, frequency, duration, timing, area of extent, and the level of best management practices (BMPs) employed for mitigating of soil disturbances. Feedstock growing, stand tending, harvesting, and wood transportation are considered nonpoint source disturbances since they occur over larger landscapes than energy production activities, which are usually localized at power plants. Water‐quantity effects of forest bioenergy production are normally associated with vegetation management and related soil disturbances. Water‐quality effects mostly occur as a result of soil disturbances during harvesting, the use of intra‐rotation silvicultural chemicals (ash, fertilizers, and herbicides), and inter‐rotation site preparation for forest regeneration. Using existing practices designed for environmental protection (BMPs), forest bioenergy programs are completely compatible with maintaining high‐quality water supplies in forested catchments. This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Climate and Environment Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment Energy and Development > Climate and Environment
Components of the hydrologic cycle.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Stacking of a Eucalyptus nitens stems in a SMZ in northern Tasmania, Australia, by a Tigercat tracked harvester (photo by Daniel G. Neary).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Harvesting of slash materials in Finland using a low ground pressure and tracked Deere bundling system (photo by Daniel G. Neary).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Relationship between precipitation and undisturbed and harvested forests (H): (a) broadleaved forests, and (b) conifer forests.,,,
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Relationship between forest area harvested and streamflow increase.,,,
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Effect of precipitation on streamflow in undisturbed and harvested forest ecosystems.,,,
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Partitioning of precipitation into output components in undisturbed forest catchments in humid regions and the effect on water supply. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 35. Copyright 2002, Elsevier.)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Energy and Development > Climate and Environment
Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment
Bioenergy > Climate and Environment

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts