Opportunities and challenges of demand response in active distribution networks

Advanced Review

Pavani Ponnaganti, Jayakrishnan R Pillai, Birgitte Bak‐Jensen

Published Online: Oct 26 2017

DOI: 10.1002/wene.271

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

In power systems, the installed generation capacity must exceed the annual peak demand, even though some capacity is kept idle most of the time. However, if it is uneconomical or not feasible to augment a sufficient capacity, the demand might exceed the available capacity. This mandates the system operator to shed the load in order to maintain security of the system. With the advent of advanced smart metering infrastructure, communication between system operator and end‐use customers makes it possible to adjust/curtail/shift the demand with respect to the state of the system. The response of the demand commonly termed as demand response (DR) can be attained either by incentive‐based or price‐based. With the help of DR, the renewable energy generation capacity can be increased by tuning the demand to match the variable and unpredictable power from renewable generation. It can also bring other benefits such as peak shaving, hosting capacity enhancement, and generation cost reduction. Furthermore, electric vehicles, heat pumps, and electric water heater can also be used as distributed storage resources to contribute to ancillary services, such as frequency/voltage regulation, peak‐shaving power or help to integrate fluctuating renewable resources. All these DR modes of operation need conventional regulatory frameworks and market design for capitalizing the available resources. Therefore, the objective of the study is to discuss the DR classification and their control strategies, DR role in microgrids and integration of renewable energy resources. Also, highlighted the opportunities and challenges along with the insights for the research scope associated with DR. WIREs Energy Environ 2018, 7:e271. doi: 10.1002/wene.271 This article is categorized under: Energy Infrastructure > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Systems Economics > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Policy and Planning > Systems and Infrastructure

General framework of DR program. BRP, balance responsible party. DR, demand response; DSO, distribution system operator.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Hierarchical DR control structure. DR, demand response.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

DR control strategies. DR, demand response; DSO, distribution system operator; EV, electric vehicle; EWH, electric water heater; HP, heat pump; PV, Photo voltaics.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Connell, NO, Pinson, P, Madsen, H, Malley, MO. Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014, 39:686–699.
Pinto, T, Vale, ZA, Morais, H, Praça, I, Ramos, C. Multi‐agent based electricity market simulator with VPP: conceptual and implementation issues. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power %26 Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada, July 2009, 1–9.
Pedersen, T, Andersen, P, Nielsen, KM, Starmose, H, Pedersen, PD. Using heat pump energy storages in the power grid. In: IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Denver, CO, USA, September 2011, 1106–1111.
Herter, K, McAuliffe, P, Rosenfeld, A. An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing of electricity. Energy 2007, 32:25–34.
Valero, S, Ortiz, M, Senabre, C, Alvarez, C, Franco, F, Gabaldon, A. Methods for customer and demand response policies selection in new electricity markets. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2007, 1:104–110.
U.S. Department of Energy, Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Market and Recommendations for Achieving Them, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy; 2006.
Mohagheghi, S, Stoupis, J, ZhenyuanWang,, ZhaoLi,, Kazemzadeh, H. Demand response architecture: integration into the distribution management system. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2010, 501–506.
U.S. Department of Energy. Use of residential smart appliances for peak‐load shifting and spinning reserves. Available at: http://www.aham.org/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/51596 (Accessed December, 2010).
Chen, C, Wang, J, Kishore, S. A distributed direct load control approach for large‐scale residential demand response. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2014, 29:2219–2228.
Gong, Y, Cai, Y, Guo, Y, Fang, Y. A privacy‐preserving scheme for incentive‐based demand response in the smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, 7:1304–1313.
Zhao, Z, Wu, L, Zhang, S, Li, X. An enhanced network‐constrained UC model for leveraging system operation cost and financial profitability of incentive‐based DR loads. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, PP:1–1.
Wu, Q, Wang, P, Goel, L. Direct load control (DLC) considering nodal interrupted energy assessment rate (NIEAR) in restructured power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2010, 25:1449–1456.
Ramanathan, B, Vittal, V. A framework for evaluation of advanced direct load control with minimum disruption. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008, 23:1681–1688.
Ruiz, N, Cobelo, I, Oyarzabal, J. A direct load control model for virtual power plant management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2009, 24:959–996.
Kardakos, EG, Simoglou, CK, Bakirtzis, AG. Optimal offering strategy of a virtual power plant: a stochastic bi‐level approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, 72:794–806.
Aalami, HA, Moghaddam, MP, Yousefi, GR. Demand response modeling considering interruptible/curtailable loads and capacity market programs. Appl Energy 2010, 87:243–250.
Syrri, ALA, Mancarella, P. Reliability and risk assessment of post‐contingency demand response in smart distribution networks. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 2016, 7:1–12.
Aalami, HA, Parsa Moghaddam, M, Yousefi, GR. Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Electr Power Syst Res 2010, 80:426–435.
Moghaddam, MP, Sheikh‐El‐Eslam, MK, Jadid, S. A MADM framework for generation expansion planning in small electricity firms. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005, 1:185–189.
Zhang, T, Yuan, J. Decision‐aid for power distribution system planning problems using ELECTRE III. In: Seventh International IEEE Power Engineering Conference (IPCE), Singapore, November 2005, 1–5.
Saric, AT, Ciric, RM. Multi‐objective integration of real‐time functions in distribution management system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2003, 25:247–256.
Zarnikau, JW. Demand participation in the restructured electric reliability council of Texas market. Energy 2010, 35:1536–1543.
Wang, Y, Pordanjani, IR, Xu, W. An event‐driven demand response scheme for power system security enhancement. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2011, 2:23–29.
Dong, Y, Xie, X, Wang, K, Zhou, B, Jiang, Q. An emergency‐demand‐response based under speed load shedding scheme to improve short‐term voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2017, PP:1–1.
Wang, Z, Wang, J. Review on implementation and assessment of conservation voltage reduction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2014, 29:1306–1315.
Mohsenian‐Rad, A, Wong, VWS, Jatskevich, J, Schober, R, Leon‐Garcia, A. Autonomous demand‐side management based on game‐theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2010, 1:320–331.
Conejo, AJ, Morales, JM, Baringo, L. Real‐time demand response model. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2010, 1:236–243.
Taylor, T, Schwarz, PM, Cochell, JE. 24/7 hourly response to electricity real‐time pricing with up to eight summers of experience. J Regul Econ 2005, 27:235–262.
Herter, K. Residential implementation of critical‐peak pricing of electricity. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2121–2130.
Wang, Z, Paranjape, R. Optimal residential demand response for multiple heterogeneous homes with real‐time price prediction in a multiagent framework. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2017, 83:1173–1184.
Yang, H, Zhang, J, Qiu, J, Zhang, S, Lai, M, Dong, Z. A practical pricing approach to smart grid demand response based on load classification. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, PP: 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2547883
Jia, L, Tong, L. Dynamic pricing and distributed energy management for demand response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, 7:1128–1136.
McKenna, K, Keane, A. Residential load modeling of price‐based demand response for network impact studies. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, 7:2285–2294.
Tsui, KM, Chan, SC. Demand response optimization for smart home scheduling under real‐time pricing. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012, 3:1812–1821.
Herranz, R, Munoz San Roque, A, Villar, J, Campos, FA. Optimal demand‐side bidding strategies in electricity spot markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012, 27:1204–1213.
Agneessens, J, Vandoorn, T, Meersman, B, Vandevelde, L. The use of binary particle swarm optimization to obtain a demand side management system. In: Proceedings of the IET Conference on Renewable Power Generation (RPG2011), Edinburgh, UK, September 2011, 1–6.
Kunwar, N, Kamal, Y, Kumar, R. Area‐load based pricing in DSM through ANN and heuristic scheduling. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2013, 4:1275–1281.
Qian, LP, Zhang, YJA, Huang, J, Wu, Y. Demand response management via real‐time electricity price control in smart grids. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 2013, 31:1268–1280.
Chakraborty, S, Ito, T, Senjyu, T, Saber, AY. Intelligent economic operation of smart‐grid facilitating fuzzy advanced quantum evolutionary method. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2013, 4:905–916.
Faria, P, Soares, J, Vale, Z, Morais, H, Sousa, T. Modified particle swarm optimization applied to integrated demand response and DG resources scheduling. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2013, 4:606–616.
Pedrasa, MAA, Spooner, TD, MacGill, IF. Coordinated scheduling of residential distributed energy resources to optimize smart home energy services. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2010, 1:134–143.
Rogers, DF, Polak, GG. Optimal clustering of time periods for electricity demand‐side management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013, 28:3842–3851.
Zhang, C, Xu, Y, Dong, ZY, Wong, KP. Robust coordination of distributed generation and price‐based demand response in microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2017, PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2653198
Kumar Nunna, HSVS, Doolla, S. Energy management in microgrids using demand response and distributed storage—a multiagent approach. IEEE Trans Power Del 2013, 28:939–947.
Murphy, C, Soroudi, A, Keane, A. Information gap decision theory‐based congestion and voltage management in the presence of uncertain wind power. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2016, 7:841–849.
Nguyen, DT, Le, LB. Risk‐constrained profit maximization for microgrid aggregators with demand response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid Jan. 2015, 6:135–146.
Aghaei, J, Alizadeh, M‐I. Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 18:64–72.
Ilic, MD, Xie, L, Joo, JY. Efficient coordination of wind power and price‐responsive demand. Part I: theoretical foundations. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011, 26:1875–1884.
Ilic, MD, Xie, L, Joo, JY. Efficient coordination of wind power and price‐responsive demand. Part II: case studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011, 26:1885–1893.
Papavasiliou, A, Oren, SS. Coupling wind generators with deferrable loads. In: Energy 2030 Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2008, 17–18.
Roscoe, AJ, Ault, G. Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real‐time electricity pricing and demand response. IET Renew Power Gener 2010, 4:369–382.
Simoglou, CK, Kardakos, EG, Bakirtzis, AG. Benefits of demand response on a wind power producer bidding strategy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2015:1–6.
Shafie‐khah, M, Heydarian‐Forushani, E, Osorio, GJ, Gil, FAS, Aghaei, J, Barani, M, Catalão, JPS. Optimal behavior of electric vehicle parking lots as demand response aggregation agents. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, 7:2654–2665.
Karfopoulos, EL, Hatziargyriou, ND. A multi‐agent system for controlled charging of a large population of electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013, 282:1196–1204.
Mocci, S, Natale, N, Pilo, F, Ruggeri, S. Multi‐agent control system to coordinate optimal electric vehicles charging and demand response actions in active distribution networks. In: Third Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014), Naples, Italy, 2014, 1–6.
Rassaei, F, Soh, WS, Chua, K. Demand response for residential electric vehicles with random usage patterns in smart grids. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2015, 6:1367–1376.
Vedady Moghadam, MR, Ma, RTB, Zhang, R. Distributed frequency control in smart grids via randomized demand response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014, 5:2798–2809.
Akmal, M, Flynn, D, Kennedy, J, Fox, B. Flexible heat load for managing wind variability in the Irish power system. In: Universities Proceedings of the 44th International Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Glasgow, UK, September 2009, 1–5.
Papaefthymiou, G, Hasche, B, Nabe, C. Potential of heat pumps for demand side management and wind power integration in the German electricity market. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2012, 3:636–642.
Pourmousavi, S, Patrick, S, Nehrir, M. Real‐time demand response through aggregate electric water heaters for load shifting and balancing wind generation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014, 5:769–778.
Kondoh, J, Lu, N, Hammerstrom, D. An evaluation of the water heater load potential for providing regulation service. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011, 26:1309–1316.
Kundur, P. Power System Stability and Control. USA: McGraw‐Hill Inc.; 1994.
Lu, S, Samaan, N, Diao, R, Elizondo, M, Jin, C, Mayhorn, E, Zhang, Y, Kirkham, H. Centralized and decentralized control for demand response. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Anaheim, CA, USA, January 1994, 1–8.
Bose, A. Chapter in stability and control of dynamical systems and applications. In: Liu, D, Antsaklis, PJ, eds. Power System Stability: New Opportunities for Control. Boston, MA: Birkhauser; 2003 Available at: http://gridstat.eecs.wsu.edu/Bose-GridComms-Overview-Chapter.pdf.
Benysek, G, Bojarski, J, Smolenski, R, Jarnut, M, Werminski, S. Application of stochastic decentralized active demand response (DADR) system for load frequency control. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016, PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2574891
Bhattarai, BP. Intelligent control and operation of distribution system. PhD Thesis, Aalborg Universitet, July 2016.
Bhattarai, B, Kouzelis, K, Mendaza, I, Bak‐Jensen, B, Pillai, J, Myers, K. Smart grid constraint violation management for balancing and regulating purposes. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 2017, PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2688464
Schirrer, A, Konig, O, Ghaemi, S, Kupzog, F, Kozek, M. Hierarchical application of model‐predictive control for efficient integration of active buildings into low voltage grids. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber‐Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES), Berkeley, CA, USA, May 2013, 1–6.
Mendaza, IDDC, Szczesny, IG, Pillai, JR, Bak‐Jensen, B. Flexible demand control to enhance the dynamic operation of low voltage networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014, 6:705–715.
Haring, TW, Mathieu, JL, Andersson, G. Comparing centralized and decentralized contract design enabling direct load control for reserves. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2016, 31:2044–2054.
Andersen, PB, Hu, J, Heussen, K. Coordination strategies for distribution grid congestion management in a multi‐actor, multi‐objective setting. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Berlin, Germany, October 2012, 1–8.
OpenADR alliance. OpenADR 2.0 specification. Available at: http://www.openadr.org (Accessed July 2013).
Muttaqi, KM, Le, ADT, Negnevitsky, M, Ledwich, G. A coordinated voltage control approach for coordination of OLTC, voltage regulator, and DG to regulate voltage in a distribution feeder. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2015, 51:1239–1248.
Singh, SN, Ostergaard, J. Use of demand response in electricity markets: an overview and key issues. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the European Energy Market, Madrid, Spain, June 2010, 1–6.
Baharlouei, Z, Hashemi, M. Demand side management challenges in smart grid: a review. In: Proceedings of the Smart Grid Conference, Tehran, Iran, December 2013, 96–101.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Assessment of demand response and advanced metering staff report, December 2015.
Lisovich, MA, Mulligan, DK, Wicker, SB. Inferring personal information from demand‐response systems. IEEE Secur Priv 2010, 8:11–20.
Siano, P. Demand response and smart grids—a survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014, 30:461–478.
Yusta, JM, Khodr, HM, Urdaneta, AJ. Optimal pricing of default customers in electrical distribution systems: effect behavior performance of demand response models. Electr Power Syst Res 2007, 77:548–558.
Motegi, N, Piette, MA, Watson, DS, Kiliccote, S, Xu, P. Introduction of commercial building control strategies and techniques for demand response. Report No. LBNL‐59975. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available at: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/59975.pdf (Accessed May, 2007).
Markushevich, N, Chan, E. Integrated voltage, var control and demand response in distribution systems. In: Proceedings of the Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2009 (PSCE `09), Seattle, WA, USA, March 2009, 15–18.

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

Opportunities and challenges of demand response in active distribution networks

Related Articles

Browse by Topic

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox