How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.
WIREs Energy Environ.
Impact Factor: 2.922
Reliability analysis of offshore grids—An overview of recent research
Focus Article
Published Online: Jun 21 2018
DOI: 10.1002/wene.309
Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.
For the future, a large‐scale expansion of offshore wind energy is expected in Europe. To collect this wind energy and to enable electricity trading between countries, an offshore network will be implemented in the North Sea. Maintaining a high level of security of supply at affordable costs is one of the key objectives in the design and operation of power systems and therefore, the reliability of offshore grids is an important topic of discussion. Whereas onshore, the security of supply is assured by reliability criteria like n‐1 redundancy, the same n‐1 redundancy might not be an economical solution for offshore networks. For todays (small) offshore networks, n‐1 redundancy is hardly economically justifiable, seen from a wind farm owner's point of view. The question then arises how the reliability of large‐scale offshore networks should be evaluated and what measures can be taken to maintain a high security of supply onshore. This paper aims at discussing this topic by reviewing the results of recent research work. It is found that whereas for smaller offshore networks reliability evaluation is mainly an economic analysis seen from a wind farm owner's point of view, for large‐scale offshore networks, it is necessary to consider the interaction of offshore–onshore networks in reliability analysis. It is proposed to analyze the reliability of combined offshore–onshore power systems in an integrated approach, such that various (offshore and onshore) measures can be considered to find the most economical solution. This article is categorized under: Wind Power > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Infrastructure > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Systems Economics > Systems and Infrastructure
Overview of the causes of power imbalance (1‐hr time frame, 3‐GW installed wind capacity; Tuinema et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Offshore network configurations considered in the study by Tuinema et al. ()
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Net present value (NPV) comparison of the BC1 and BC1 & HC1 configuration as a function of energy price and offshore cable length (Getreuer et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Amount of saved energy for different branch coupler capacities (Getreuer et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Net present value (NPV) of different configurations (per 350‐MW connection; Getreuer et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Lost and saved energy for different branch and hub coupler configurations (Getreuer et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]
Overview of near‐shore grid configurations with optional branch and hub couplers (Getreuer et al., )
[
Normal View
|
Magnified View
]