Framework for assessing land‐management effects on at‐risk species: Example of SE USA wood pellet production and gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)

Overview

Esther S. Parish, Latha M. Baskaran, Virginia H. Dale

Published Online: Jul 09 2020

DOI: 10.1002/wene.385

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract Land‐management choices made for economic and societal gains intrinsically influence landscapes and species that are dependent upon them. We propose a simple analysis framework to examine critical intersections between land‐management choices and the life‐history conditions of selected species of concern, thereby facilitating the identification of mitigation practices that can reduce negative impacts on species at risk. We test the proposed framework through application to gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), a keystone species that is the focus of conservation efforts across the southeastern region of United States of America, where wood pellets are being produced for bioenergy. Production of these wood pellets for export to Europe and Asia has drastically increased in the past decade, raising concerns about potential harm to biodiversity since many species in the forests sourcing pellet production were already at risk prior to the development of this new commodity. Identifying the mechanisms of potential impacts of wood pellet production on species of concern is essential to establishing meaningful management recommendations that can enhance conservation efforts while supporting sustainable bioenergy. By considering the intersections between life‐history conditions of gopher tortoise and forest‐management practices related to woody biomass extraction for pellet production, we identify several mechanisms by which the wood‐pellet industry might affect this species of concern, both positively and negatively. We then identify mitigation practices that can help offset the potential impacts of logging, thinning, and dead wood removal on gopher tortoise. Our analysis framework may be transferable to other species of concern and land‐management practices across diverse landscapes. This article is categorized under: Bioenergy > Economics and Policy Bioenergy > Climate and Environment

Gopher tortoise priority areas of conservation (shown in pink) overlap with export pellet mills and their wood sourcing areas (shown in green) across six states in the southeastern USA. Gopher tortoise sightings (USGS 2019) within these areas are shown for the available years since pellet production began (i.e., 2009–2018). Four nearby shipping ports through which wood pellets have been sent to Europe and Asia (i.e., New Orleans, Mobile, Savannah, and Tampa) are also depicted (Data Sources: Databasin.org, Forisk, 2018, Hewes, Butler, & Liknes, 2017, USITC, 2019)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Timberland wood removals and woody feedstock types associated with SE USA wood pellet production for bioenergy (Abt et al., 2014; Parish et al., 2017). Nearly half of the pellets from the region supporting gopher tortoise populations are produced from second‐hand mill residues that are not included in this diagram (Forisk, 2018)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Gopher tortoise life‐history conditions that are impacted by wood pellet production (blue boxes) shown in relation to supporting forest habitat characteristics (white boxes)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Abt,, K. L., Abt,, R. C., Galik,, C. S., & Skog,, K. E. (2014). Effect of policies on pellet production and forests in the US south. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service southern Research Station.
Aresco,, M. J., & Guyer,, C. (1999). Growth of the tortoise Gopherus polyphemus in slash pine plantations of southcentral Alabama. Herpetologica, 55(4), 499–506.
Ashton,, K. G., Engelhardt,, B. M., & Branciforte,, B. S. (2008). Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) abundance and distribution after prescribed fire reintroduction to Florida scrub and sandhill at Archbold Biological Station. Journal of Herpetology, 42(3), 523–529.
Auffenberg,, W., & Franz,, R. (1982). Status and distribution of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). In R. B. Bury, (Ed.), North American tortoises: Conservation and ecology. Wildlife Research Report 12 (pp. 95–126). Washington, DC: US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service.
Baldan,, D., Piniewski,, M., Funk,, A., Gumpinger,, C., Flödl,, P., Höfer,, S., … Hein,, T. (2020). A multi‐scale, integrative modeling framework for setting conservation priorities at the catchment scale for the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 137369.
Baskaran,, L. M., Dale,, V. H., Efroymson,, R. A., & Birkhead,, W. (2006). Habitat modeling within a regional context: An example using gopher tortoise. The American Midland Naturalist, 155(2), 335–351.
Beauman,, R. L. (2008). The effects of burrow collapse on the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) (Master`s Thesis). Auburn, AL: Auburn University Retrieved from https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/1024/Beauman_Richard_19.pdf?sequence=1
Birkhead,, R. D., Guyer,, C., Hermann,, S. M., & Michener,, W. K. (2005). Patterns of folivory and seed ingestion by gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in a southeastern pine savanna. American Midland Naturalist, 154(1), 143–151.
Boarman,, W. I., & Sazaki,, M. (2006). A highway`s road‐effect zone for desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). Journal of Arid Environments, 65(1), 94–101.
Boukherroub,, T., LeBel,, L., & Lemieux,, S. (2017). An integrated wood pellet supply chain development: Selecting among feedstock sources and a range of operating scales. Applied Energy, 198, 385–400.
Brown,, M. B., McLaughlin,, G. S., Klein,, P. A., Crenshaw,, B. C., Schumacher,, I. M., Brown,, D. R., & Jacobson,, E. R. (1999). Upper respiratory tract disease in the gopher tortoise is caused by Mycoplasma agassizii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37(7), 2262–2269.
Conde,, L. F., Swindel,, B. F., & Smith,, J. E. (1983). Plant species cover, frequency, and biomass: Early responses to clearcutting, burning, windrowing, discing, and bedding in Pinus elliottii Flatwoods. Forest Ecology and Management, 6(4), 319–331.
Cornwall,, W. (2017). Is wood a green source of energy? Scientists are divided. Science, 355, 18–21.
Costanza,, J. K., Abt,, R. C., McKerrow,, A. J., & Collazo,, J. A. (2017). Bioenergy production and forest landscape change in the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 9(5), 924–939.
Dale,, V. H., Kline,, K. L., Parish,, E. S., Cowie,, A. L., Emory,, R., Malmsheimer,, R. W., … Wellisch,, M. (2017). Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 9, 1296–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12445
Dale,, V. H., Parish,, E., Kline,, K. L., & Tobin,, E. (2017). How is wood‐based pellet production affecting forest conditions in the southeastern United States? Forest Ecology and Management, 396, 143–149.
Davis,, J. C., Castleberry,, S. B., & Kilgo,, J. C. (2010). Influence of coarse woody debris on herpetofaunal communities in upland pine stands of the southeastern coastal plain. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(6), 1111–1117.
Demarais,, S., Verschuyl,, J. P., Roloff,, G. J., Miller,, D. A., & Wigley,, T. B. (2017). Tamm review: Terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity and intensive forest management in the US. Forest Ecology and Management, 385, 308–330.
Di Fluvio,, F., Forsell,, N., Obersteiner,, M., & Hellwig,, S. (2019). Spatially explicit LCA analysis of biodiversity losses due to different bioenergy policies in the European Union. The Science of the Total Environment, 651, 1505–1516.
Diaz,, M., Illera,, J., & Hedo,, D. (2001). Strategic environmental assessment of plans and programs: A methodology for estimating effects on biodiversity. Environmental Management, 28, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0026702412
Diemer,, J. E. (1986). The ecology and management of the gopher tortoise in the southeastern United States. Herpetologica, 42(1), 125–133.
Diemer,, J. E. (1992). Home range and movements of the tortoise Gopherus polyphemus in northern Florida. Journal of Herpetology, 26, 158–165.
Diemer,, J. E., Kiltie,, R. A., & Thomas,, T. M. (2012). Long‐term population dynamics of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in a pine plantation in northern Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 11(1), 50–58.
Diemer,, J. E., & Moler,, P. E. (1982). Gopher tortoise response to site preparation in northern Florida. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (Vol. 36, pp. 634–637).
Donner,, D. M., Wigley,, T. B., & Miller,, D. A. (2017). Forest biodiversity and woody biomass harvesting [Chapter 11]. In R. A. Efroymson,, M. H. Langholtz,, K. E. Johnson,, & B. J. Stokes, (Eds.), Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy, volume 2: Environmental sustainability effects of select scenarios from volume 1. ORNL/TM‐2016/727 (pp. 398–447). Oak Ridge, TN: US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Duden,, A. S., Rubino,, M. J., Tarr,, N. M., Verweij,, P. A., Faaij,, A. P. C., & van der Hilst,, F. (2018). Impact of increased wood pellet demand on biodiversity in the South‐Eastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 10(11), 841–860.
Duden,, A. S., Verweij,, P. A., Junginger,, H. M., Abt,, R. C., Henderson,, J. D., Dale,, V. H., … van der Hilst,, F. (2017). Modeling the impacts of wood pellet demand on forest dynamics in southeastern United States. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 11, 1007–1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1803
Dymond,, C. C., Titus,, B. D., Stinson,, G., & Kurz,, W. A. (2010). Future quantities and spatial distribution of harvesting residue and dead wood from natural disturbances in Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(2), 181–192.
Dziadzio,, M. C., & Smith,, L. L. (2016). Vertebrate use of gopher tortoise burrows and aprons. Southeastern Naturalist, 15(4), 586–594.
Dziadzio,, M. C., Smith,, L. L., Chandler,, R. B., & Castleberry,, S. B. (2016). Effect of nest location on gopher tortoise nest survival. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 80(7), 1314–1322.
Efroymson,, R. A., Jager,, H. I., Dale,, V. H., & Westervelt,, J. D. (2009). A framework for developing management goals for species at risk with examples from military installations in the United States. Environmental Management, 44, 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9385-6
Eisenberg,, J. F. (1983). The gopher tortoise as a keystone species. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Gopher Tortoise Council, vol. 4, pp. 1–4.
Evans,, J. M., Fletcher,, R. J., Alavalapati,, J., Calabria,, J., Geller,, D., Smith,, A. L., … Vasudev,, D. (2013). Forestry Bioenergy in the Southeast United States: Implications for Wildlife Habitat and Biodiversity [Report] (p. 275). Merrifield, VA: National Wildlife Federation and Southern Environmental Law Center.
Forisk (2018). Wood Energy US Database and customized data pull purchased from Forisk Consulting, LLC on April 13, 2018 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Franz,, R. (1986). The Florida gopher frog and the Florida pine snake as burrow associates of the gopher tortoise in northern Florida. The Gopher Tortoise and Its Community, pp. 16–20.
Fritts,, S., Moorman,, C., Grodsky,, S., Hazel,, D., Homyack,, J., Farrell,, C., … Greene,, D. (2017). Rodent response to harvesting woody biomass for bioenergy production. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 81, 1170–1178.
Fritts,, S. R., Moorman,, C. E., Hazel,, D. W., & Jackson,, B. D. (2014). Biomass harvesting guidelines affect downed woody debris retention. Biomass and Bioenergy, 70, 382–391.
Gasparatos,, A., Doll,, C. N., Esteban,, M., Ahmed,, A., & Olang,, T. A. (2017). Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a green economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 161–184.
Gaudreault,, C., Wigley,, T. B., Margni,, M., Verschuyl,, J., Vice,, K., & Titus,, B. (2016). Addressing biodiversity impacts of land use in life cycle assessment of forest biomass harvesting. WIREs Energy and Environment, 5(6), 670–683.
Gibbon,, J. W., Scott,, D. E., Ryan,, T. J., Buhlmann,, K. A., Tuberville,, T. D., Metts,, B. S., … Winne,, C. T. (2000). The Global Decline of Reptiles, Déjà Vu Amphibians: Reptile species are declining on a global scale). Six significant threats to reptile populations are habitat loss and degradation, introduced invasive species, environmental pollution, disease, unsustainable use, and global climate change. Bioscience, 50(8), 653–666.
Golladay,, S. W., Martin,, K. L., Vose,, J. M., Wear,, D. N., Covich,, A. P., Hobbs,, R. J., … Shearer,, A. J. (2016). Achievable future conditions as a framework for guiding forest conservation and management. Forest Ecology and Management, 360, 80–96.
Gopher Tortoise Council. (2019). The gopher tortoise: A species in decline. Retrieved from http://www.gophertortoisecouncil.org/gt/.
Gottlieb,, I. G., Fletcher,, R. J., Nuñez‐Regueiro,, M. M., Ober,, H., Smith,, L., & Brosi,, B. J. (2017). Alternative biomass strategies for bioenergy: Implications for bird communities across the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 9(11), 1606–1617.
Greene,, R. E., Iglay,, R. B., Evans,, K. O., Wigley,, T. B., & Miller,, D. A. (2019). Estimating capacity of managed pine forests in the southeastern US to provide open pine woodland condition and gopher tortoise habitat. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 200–208.
Grodsky,, S. M., Moorman,, C. E., Fritts,, S. R., Campbell,, J. W., Sorenson,, C. E., Bertone,, M. A., … Wigley,, T. B. (2018). Invertebrate community response to coarse woody debris removal for bioenergy production from intensively managed forests. Ecological Applications, 28, 135–148.
Grodsky,, S. M., Moorman,, C. E., Fritts,, S. R., Castleberry,, S. B., & Wigley,, T. B. (2016). Breeding, early‐successional bird response to forest harvests for bioenergy. PLoS One, 11(10), e0165070.
Grodsky,, S. M., Moorman,, C. E., Fritts,, S. R., Hazel,, D. W., Homyack,, J. A., Castleberry,, S. B., & Wigley,, T. B. (2016). Winter bird use of harvest residues in clearcuts and the implications of forest bioenergy harvest in the southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 379, 91–101.
Guisan,, A., Tingley,, R., Baumgartner,, J. B., Naujokaitis‐Lewis,, I., Sutcliffe,, P. R., Tulloch,, A. I. T., … Buckley,, Y. M. (2013). Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters, 16, 1424–1435.
Guyer,, C., Johnson,, V. M., & Hermann,, S. M. (2012). Effects of population density on patterns of movement and behavior of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Herpetological Monographs, 26(1), 122–134.
Harmon,, M. E., Franklin,, J. F., Swanson,, F. J., Sollins,, P., Gregory,, S. V., Lattin,, J. D., … Lienkaemper,, G. W. (1986). Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 133–302.
Hartley,, M. J. (2002). Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 81–95.
Hermann,, S. M., Guyer,, C., Waddle,, J. H., & Nelms,, M. G. (2002). Sampling on private property to evaluate population status and effects of land use practices on the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus. Biological Conservation, 108(3), 289–298.
Hewes,, J. H., Butler,, B. J., & Liknes,, G. C. (2017). Forest ownership in the conterminous United States circa 2014: Distribution of seven ownership types—Geospatial dataset. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2017-0007
Hoefnagels,, R., Junginger,, M., & Faaij,, A. (2014). The economic potential of wood pellet production from alternative, low‐value wood sources in the southeast of the US. Biomass and Bioenergy, 71, 443–454.
Homyack,, J. A., Aardweg,, Z., Gorman,, T. A., & Chalcraft,, D. R. (2013). Initial effects of woody biomass removal and intercropping of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) on herpetofauna in eastern North Carolina. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37(2), 327–335.
Homyack,, J. A., & Verschuyl,, J. (2019). Renewable energy and wildlife conservation [Chapter 2]. In C. E. Moorman,, S. M. Grodsky,, & S. Rupp, (Eds.), Effects of harvesting Forest‐based biomass on terrestrial wildlife. (p. 280). Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
Innes,, R. J. (2009). Gopherus polyphemus. In Fire effects information system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Retrieved from http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/reptile/gopo/all.html
Jacobson,, E. R., Brown,, M. B., Wendland,, L. D., Brown,, D. R., Klein,, P. A., Christopher,, M. M., & Berry,, K. H. (2014). Mycoplasmosis and upper respiratory tract disease of tortoises: A review and update. Veterinary Journal, 201(3), 257–264.
Janowiak,, M. K., & Webster,, C. R. (2010). Promoting ecological sustainability in woody biomass harvesting. Journal of Forestry, 108(1), 16–23.
Jones,, J. C., & Dorr,, B. (2004). Habitat associations of gopher tortoise burrows on industrial timberlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 456–464.
Jungers,, J. M., Fargione,, J. E., Sheaffer,, C. C., Wyse,, D. L., & Lehman,, C. (2013). Energy potential of biomass from conservation grasslands in Minnesota, USA. PLoS One, 8(4), e61209.
Larcher,, I. (2018). Biodiversity. In D. A. Dellasala, & M. I. Goldstein, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene (p. 2,280). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Lengyel,, S., Kobler,, A., Kutnar,, L., Framstad,, E., Henry,, P. Y., Babij,, V., … Henle,, K. (2008). A review and a framework for the integration of biodiversity monitoring at the habitat level. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 3341–3356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9359-7
Lõhmus,, A., Fridolin,, H., Leivits,, A., Tõnisson,, K., & Rannap,, R. (2019). Prioritizing research gaps for national conservation management and policy: The managers’ perspective in Estonia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 2565–2579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01779-8
Lowenthal‐Savy,, D. (2015). UK`s Renewable Energy Targets Drive Increases in U.S. Wood Pellet Exports. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=20912.
MacDonald,, L. A., & Mushinsky,, H. R. (1988). Foraging ecology of the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus, in a sandhill habitat. Herpetologica, 44, 345–353.
Master,, L. L. (1991). Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology, 5, 559–563.
McBride,, A., Dale,, V. H., Baskaran,, L., Downing,, M., Eaton,, L., Efroymson,, R. A., … Storey,, J. (2011). Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1277–1289.
McCoy,, E. D., Mushinsky,, H. R., & Lindzey,, J. (2006). Declines of the gopher tortoise on protected lands. Biological Conservation, 128(1), 120–127.
McGuire,, J. L., Smith,, L. L., Guyer,, C., & Yabsley,, M. J. (2014). Effects of mycoplasmal upper‐respiratory‐tract disease on movement and thermoregulatory behavior of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) in Georgia, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 50(4), 745–756.
McKenney,, B. A., & Kiesecker,, J. M. (2010). Policy development for biodiversity offsets: A review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management, 45, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9396-3
Mendonça,, M. T., Beauman,, R. L., & Balbach,, H. (2007). Burrow collapse as a potential stressor on the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). Final Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC/CERL TR‐07‐33. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Michelsen,, O. (2008). Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.04.316
Mills,, L. S., Soule,, M. E., & Doak,, D. F. (1993). The keystone‐species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience, 43(4), 219–224.
Mushinsky,, H. R., Stilson,, T. A., & McCoy,, E. D. (2003). Diet and dietary preference of the juvenile gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). Herpetologica, 59(4), 475–483.
Norton,, D. A. (2009). Biodiversity offsets: Two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework. Environmental Management, 43, 698–706.
O`Connell,, B. M., Conkling,, B., Wilson,, B. A., Burrill,, E., Turner,, J., Pugh,, S., … Menlove,, J. (2017). The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and User Guide for Phase 2 (version 7.0) (p. 830). Knoxville, TN: USDA Forest Services.
Olbrych,, C. (2016). Modeling burrow choice in Gopherus polyphemus [Bachelor`s Thesis, May 2016]. Jupiter, FL: Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University.
Olesen,, A. S., Kittler,, B., Price,, W., & Aguilar,, F. X. (2015). Environmental implications of increased reliance of the EU on biomass from the south east US (p. 360). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Owens,, A. K., Moseley,, K. R., McCay,, T. S., Castleberry,, S. B., Kilgo,, J. C., & Ford,, W. M. (2008). Amphibian and reptile community response to coarse woody debris manipulations in upland loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(12), 2078–2083.
Ozgul,, A., Oli,, M. K., Bolker,, B. M., & Perez‐Heydrich,, C. (2009). Upper respiratory tract disease, force of infection, and effects on survival of gopher tortoises. Ecological Applications, 19(3), 786–798.
Paine,, R. T. (1969). A note on trophic complexity and community stability. The American Naturalist, 103(929), 91–93.
Parish,, E. S., Dale,, V. H., Kline,, K. L., & Abt,, R. C. (2017). Reference scenarios for evaluating wood pellet production in the southeastern United States. WIREs Energy and Environment, 6, e259. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.259
Parish,, E. S., Herzberger,, A., Phifer,, C., & Dale,, V. H. (2018). Transatlantic wood pellet trade demonstrates telecoupled benefits. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 28.
Pelkmans,, L., Goh,, C. S., Junginger,, H. M., Parhar,, R., Bianco,, E., Pellini,, A., & Benedetti,, L. (2014). Impact of promotion mechanisms for advanced and low‐iLUC biofuels on biomass markets: Summary Report. IEA Bioenergy Task 40 (p. 40). Paris, France: IEA.
Pokharel,, R., Grala,, R. K., Grebner,, D. L., & Cooke,, W. H. (2019). Mill willingness to use logging residues to produce electricity: A spatial logistic regression approach. Forest Science, 65, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxy061
Power,, M. E., Dietrich,, W. E., & Finlay,, J. C. (1996). Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: Potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change. Environmental Management, 20(6), 887–895.
Power,, M. E., Tilman,, D., Estes,, J. A., Menge,, B. A., Bond,, W. J., Mills,, L. S., … Paine,, R. T. (1996). Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience, 46, 609–620.
Riffell,, S., Verschuyl,, J., Miller,, D., & Wigley,, T. B. (2011). Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity–a meta‐analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(4), 878–887.
Root,, H. T., & Betts,, M. G. (2016). Managing moist temperate forests for bioenergy and biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 114(1), 66–74.
Rudolphi,, J., & Gustafsson,, L. (2005). Effects of forest‐fuel harvesting on the amount of deadwood on clear‐cuts. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Resources, 20(3), 235–242.
Rundio,, D. E., & Olson,, D. H. (2007). Influence of headwater site conditions and riparian buffers on terrestrial salamander response to forest thinning. Forest Science, 53(2), 320–330.
Russell,, K. R., Wigley,, T. B., Baughman,, W. M., Hanlin,, H. G., & Ford,, W. M. (2004). Responses of Southeastern amphibians and reptiles to forest management: A review. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS‐75 (p. 319). Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
Sallabanks,, R., Arnett,, E. B., & Marzluff,, J. M. (2000). An evaluation of research on the effects of timber harvest on bird populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(4), 1144–1155.
Sandmeier,, F. C., Tracy,, C. R., & Hunter,, K. (2009). Upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) as a threat to desert tortoise populations: A reevaluation. Biological Conservation, 142(7), 1255–1268.
Scheele,, B. C., Leggea,, S., Armstrong,, D. P., Copleyd,, P., Robinson,, N., Southwell,, D., … Lindenmayer,, D. B. (2018). How to improve threatened species management: An Australian perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 223, 668–675.
Scorza,, F., Pilogallo,, A., Saganeiti,, L., & Murgante,, B. (2020). Natura 2000 areas and sites of National Interest (SNI): Measuring (un)integration between naturalness preservation and environmental remediation policies. Sustainability, 12, 2928.
Smith,, L. L., Hinderliter,, M., Taylor,, R. S., & Howze,, J. M. (2015). Recommendation for gopher tortoise burrow buffer to avoid collapse from heavy equipment. Journal of Wildlife Management, 6(2), 456–463.
Steen,, D. A., Smith,, L. L., Conner,, L. M., Litt,, A. R., Provencher,, L., Hiers,, J. K., … Guyer,, C. (2013). Reptile assemblage response to restoration of fire‐suppressed longleaf pine sandhills. Ecological Applications, 23(1), 148–158.
Stewart,, P. (2015). Wood Supply Market Trends in the US South: 1995–2015: Report prepared for the National alliance of Forest Owners. Charlotte, NC: Forest2Market, Inc.
Sutherland,, W. J. (2006). Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: A review of the methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 599–616.
Tarr,, N. M., Rubino,, M. J., Costanza,, J. K., McKerrow,, A. J., Collazo,, J. A., & Abt,, R. C. (2016). Projected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy‐induced landscape change. GCB Bioenergy, 9(5), 909–923.
Temple,, S. A. (1987). Predation on turtle nests increases near ecological edges. Copeia, 1987, 250–252.
Todd,, B. D., & Andrews,, K. M. (2008). Response of a reptile guild to forest harvesting. Conservation Biology, 22(3), 753–761.
Tuberville,, T. D., Todd,, B. D., Hermann,, S. M., Michener,, W. K., & Guyer,, C. (2014). Survival, demography, and growth of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) from three study sites with different management histories. Journal of Wildlife Management, 78(7), 1151–1160.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2019). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service searchable database. Retrieved from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/Gats/default.aspx.
Underwood,, V. J., Ober,, H. K., Miller,, D. L., & Munn,, I. A. (2012). Contributions of private landowners to the conservation of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). Environmental Management, 49(4), 846–854.
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Southeast Regional Partnership for Planning and Sustainability (SERPPAS). 2013. 4th annual report, Candidate conservation agreement for the gopher tortoise. 103 p. Retrieved from https://esadocs.defenders-cci.org/ESAdocs/misc/4thAnnualReportofGTCCA.pdf.
USFS. (2014a). Resource Planning Act (RPA) Timber Product Output (TPO) database data dictionary and user`s guide, USDA Forest Service document. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/srsfia/php/tpo_2009/tpo_docs/DICTIONARY_2014_08_11.htm.
USFS. (2014b). U.S. Forest Resource Facts and Historical Trends. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service report FS‐1035. Retrieved from https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/brochures/docs/2012/ForestFacts_1952-2012_English.pdf.
USFWS. (2016). Gopher tortoise priority areas of conservation. Data layer uploaded to Data Basin by USFS Ecological Services Division`s Matthew Hinderliter on September 8, 2016. Retrieved from https://databasin.org/datasets/ffe5c916c3584ed983358b5ae9534ff1.
USGS. (2018). Georeferenced locations for gopher tortoise sightings. US Geological Survey (USGS) Biodiversity Information Serving Our Nation (BISON) database at https://bison.usgs.gov.
USITC. (2019). Interactive tariff and trade data from the US Department of Commerce and the US International Trade Commission. (USITC). Washington, DC: USITC Retrieved from https://dataweb.usitc.gov/
van Lear,, D.H. (1996). Dynamics of coarse woody debris in southern forest ecosystems, biodiversity of coarse woody debris in southern forests: Proceedings of the work. Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity. US Forest Services General Technical Report SE‐94. 10 p.
Velázqueza,, J., Tejerab,, R., Hernandob,, A., & Núñeza,, M. V. (2010). Environmental diagnosis: Integrating biodiversity conservation in management of Natura 2000 forest spaces. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4), 309–317.
Verschuyl,, J., Riffell,, S., Miller,, D., & Wigley,, T. B. (2011). Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in north American forests–a meta‐analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(2), 221–232.
Waylen,, K. A., Blackstock,, K. L., van Hulst,, F. J., Damian,, C., Horvath,, F., Johson,, R. K., … Van Uytvanck,, J. (2019). Policy‐driven monitoring and evaluation: Does it support adaptive management of socio‐ecological systems? Science of the Total Environment, 662(20), 373–384.
Wester,, E. E., & Kolb,, J. W. (2008). Impact of natural gas pipeline operation and maintenance on long‐term population viability of the threatened gopher tortoise. In J. W. Goodrich‐Mahoney,, L. Abrahamson,, J. Ballard,, & S. Tikalsky, (Eds.), Eighth international symposium on environmental concerns in rights‐of‐way management (pp. 499–511). New York: Elsevier.
Wetterer,, J. K., & Moore,, J. W. (2005). Red imported fire ants (hymenoptera: Formicidae) at gopher tortoise (Testudines: Testudinidae) burrows. Florida Entomologist, 88, 349–354.
Whiles,, M. R. & Grubaugh,, J. W. (1996). Importance of coarse woody debris to southern forest herpetofauna: Biodiversity and coarse woody debris in southern forests: effects on biodiversity. US Forest Service. GTR‐SE‐94. 94 p.

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

Framework for assessing land‐management effects on at‐risk species: Example of SE USA wood pellet production and gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)

Browse by Topic

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox