This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Forensic Sci

Is the (traditional) Galilean science paradigm well suited to forensic science?

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract For more than 10 years, forensic science has been at best, criticized for its lack of scientific foundations and at worst, presented as an oxymoron. An exclusive focus on standard operating procedures and quality management could cause forensic science to fall short of addressing the epistemological issue initiated by judges. This is particularly so in rapidly changing times, including digital transformation of society and decentralization of forensic services. As a consequence, the present understanding of forensic science by both scientists and its stakeholders is questioned. It is argued that that forensic science fundamental principles and, more broadly, forensic science philosophy are pivotal to the reliable application of science to address security and justice questions. This article is categorized under: Forensic Science in Action/Crime Scene Investigation > Epistemology and Method Jurisprudence and Regulatory Oversight > Communication across Science and Law Jurisprudence and Regulatory Oversight > Expert Evidence and Narrative

Related Articles

Top Ten WFS2 Articles

Browse by Topic

Jurisprudence and Regulatory Oversight > Expert Evidence and Narrative
Jurisprudence and Regulatory Oversight > Communication Across Science and Law
Forensic Science in Action/Crime Scene Investigation > Epistemology and Method

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts