Quattrociocchi, W, Scala, A, Sunstein, CR. Echo Chambers on Facebook, June 13, 2016. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2795110.
Self, CS. Credibility. In: Salwen, MB, Stacks, DW, eds. An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. 2nd ed. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group; 2008, 435–456. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011.
Metzger, MJ. Making sense of credibility on the web: models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2007, 58:2078–2091.
Hovland, CI, Lumsdaine, AA, Fred, D. Experiments on Mass Communication. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1949.
Hovland, CI. Changes in attitude through communication. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1951, 46:424.
Hovland, CI, Janis, IL, Kelley, HH. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953.
Fogg, BJ, Tseng, H. The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15–20 May, 1999. New York, NY: ACM; 1999, 80–87.
Metzger, MJ, Flanagin, AJ, Eyal, K, Lemus, DR, McCann, RM. Credibility for the 21st century: integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Ann Int Commun Assoc 2003, 27:293–335.
Pornpitakpan, C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J Appl Soc Psychol 2004, 34:243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559‐1816.2004.tb02547.x.
Liu, Z. Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the web. Inf Process Manage 2004, 40:1027–1038.
Bernier, CL. Second‐hand knowledge. An inquiry into cognitive authority. Patrick Wilson. Greenwood Press, 1983. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1984, 35:254–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630350410.
Hilligoss, B, Rieh, SY. Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Inf Process Manage 2008, 44:1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001.
Wathen, CN, Burkell, J. Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the web. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2002, 53:134–144.
Metzger, MJ, Flanagin, AJ. Credibility and trust of information in online environments: the use of cognitive heuristics. J Pragmat 2013, 59(Part B):210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.
Flanagin, AJ, Metzger, MJ. Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008, 5–28. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.005. Accessed January 1, 2017.
Eysenbach, G. Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspectives and Implications for Youth. In: Metzger, MM, Flanagin, AJ, eds. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008, 123–154.
Sundar, SS. The main model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Metzger, MJ, Flanagin, AJ, eds. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008, 73–100.
Eysenbach, G, Köhler, C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in‐depth interviews. BMJ 2002, 324:573–577.
Kaplan, AM, Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 2010, 53:59–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
Warneken, F, Tomasello, M. Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 2006, 311:1301–1303.
Olson, KR, Spelke, ES. Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition 2008, 108:222–231.
Warneken, F, Tomasello, M. The roots of human altruism. Br J Psychol 2009, 100:455–471.
Moens, M‐F, Li, J, Chua, T‐S, eds. Mining User Generated Content, Social Media and Social Computing. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2014.
Safko, L. The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ John Wiley %26 Sons Publishing; 2010. ISBN: 0470623977.
Hajli, MN. Developing online health communities through digital media. Int J Inf Manage 2014, 34:311–314.
Hajli, MN, Sims, J, Featherman, M, Love, PE. Credibility of information in online communities. J Strateg Market 2015, 23:238–253.
Lang, A. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J Commun 2000, 50:46–70.
Liu, B. Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data. Springer‐Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Springer Science %26 Business Media; 2007.
Jindal, N, Liu, B. Review spam detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 8–12 May, 2007. New York, NY: ACM; 2007, 1189–1190.
Jindal, N, Liu, B. Opinion spam and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 11–12 February, 2008. New York, NY: ACM; 2008, 219–230.
Heydari, A, Tavakoli, M, Salim, N, Heydari, Z. Detection of review spam: a survey. Expert Syst Appl 2015, 42:3634–3642.
Crawford, M, Khoshgoftaar, TM, Prusa, JD, Richter, AN, Al Najada, H. Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques. J Big Data 2015, 2:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537‐015‐0029‐9.
Li, F, Huang, M, Yang, Y, Zhu, X. Learning to identify review spam. In: IJCAI Proceedings—International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol 22, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 16–22 July, 2011. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; 2011, 2488–2493.
Ott, M, Choi, Y, Cardie, C, Hancock, JT. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol 1, Portland, OR, USA, 19–24 June, 2011. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2011, 309–319.
Ott, M, Cardie, C, Hancock, J. Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France, 16–20 April, 2012. New York, NY: ACM; 2012, 201–210.
Banerjee, S, Chua, AY. Applauses in hotel reviews: genuine or deceptive?. In: Science and Information Conference (SAI), London, UK, 27–29 August, 2014. IEEE; 2014, 938–942.
Fusilier, DH, Montes‐y Gómez, M, Rosso, P, Cabrera, RG. Detection of opinion spam with character n‐grams. In: International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics. Springer; 2015, 285–294.
Hengeveld, K. Parts of speech. In: Fortescue, M, Harder, P, Kristoffersen, L, eds. Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1992, 29–55.
Pennebaker, JW, Francis, ME, Booth, RJ. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: Liwc 2001, vol. 71. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001, 2001.
Mukherjee, A, Venkataraman, V, Liu, B, Glance, N. Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews. Technical Report No. UIC‐CS‐03‐2013, 2013.
Mukherjee, A, Venkataraman, V, Liu, B, Glance, NS. What yelp fake review filter might be doing?. In: ICWSM, 2013.
Sun, H, Morales, A, Yan, X. Synthetic review spamming and defense. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM; 2013, 1088–1096.
Croft, B, Lafferty, J. Language Modeling for Information Retrieval, vol. 13. Dordrecht: Springer Science %26 Business Media; 2013.
Lai, CL, Xu, KQ, Lau, RYK, Li, Y, Jing, L. Toward a language modeling approach for consumer review spam detection. In: 2010 I.E. 7th International Conference on E‐Business Engineering, 2010, 1–8.
Kullback, S, Leibler, RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 1951, 22:79–86.
Lau, RYK, Liao, SY, Kwok, RC‐W, Xu, K, Xia, Y, Li, Y. Text mining and probabilistic language modeling for online review spam detection. ACM Trans Manage Inf Syst 2012, 2:25:1–25:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2070710.2070716.
Mukherjee, A, Liu, B, Wang, J, Glance, N, Jindal, N. Detecting group review spam. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM; 2011, 93–94.
Li, X, Liu, B. Learning to classify texts using positive and unlabeled data. In: IJCAI, vol 3. 2003, 587–592.
Ren, Y, Ji, D, Zhang, H. Positive unlabeled learning for deceptive reviews detection. In: EMNLP, 2014, 488–498.
Yafeng, R, Lan, Y, Donghong, J. Deceptive reviews detection based on language structure and sentiment polarity. J Front Comput Sci Technol 2014, 8:313–320.
Blei, DM, Ng, AY, Jordan, MI. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 2003, 3:993–1022.
Fusilier, DH, Móntes‐y‐Gómez, M, Rosso, P, Cabrera, RG. Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using pu‐learning. Inf Process Manage 2015, 51:433–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001.
Liu, B, Lee, WS, Yu, PS, Li, X. Partially supervised classification of text documents. In: ICML (Citeseer), vol 2, 2002, 387–394.
Abbasi, A, Zhang, Z, Zimbra, D, Chen, H, Nunamaker, JF Jr. Detecting fake websites: the contribution of statistical learning theory. MIS Q 2010, 34:435–461.
Li, F, Huang, M, Yang, Y, Zhu, X. Learning to identify review spam. In: Proceedings of the Twenty‐Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’11, vol 3, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. AAAI Press; 2011, 2488–2493, ISBN 978‐1‐57735‐515‐1.
Li, H, Liu, B, Mukherjee, A, Shao, J. Spotting fake reviews using positive‐unlabeled learning. Comput Sist 2014, 18:467–475.
Luca, M, Zervas, G. Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Manage Sci 2016, 62:3412–3427.
Viviani, M, Pasi, G. Quantifier guided aggregation for the veracity assessment of online reviews. Int J Intell Syst 2016, 32:481–501.
Lim, E‐P, Nguyen, V‐A, Jindal, N, Liu, B, Lauw, HW. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY: ACM; 2010, 939–948.
Fei, G, Mukherjee, A, Liu, B, Hsu, M, Castellanos, M, Ghosh, R. Exploiting burstiness in reviews for review spammer detection. In: ICWSM, vol 13. 2013, 175–184.
Botev, ZI, Grotowski, JF, Kroese, DP, et al. Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann Stat 2010, 38:2916–2957.
Cross, GR, Jain, AK. Markov random field texture models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1983, PAMI‐5:25–39.
Metzler, D, Croft, WB. A Markov random field model for term dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York, NY: ACM; 2005, 472–479.
Murphy, KP, Weiss, Y, Jordan, MI. Loopy belief propagation for approximate inference: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1999, 467–475.
Mukherjee, A, Liu, B, Glance, N. Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM; 2012, 191–200.
G.Wang,, S.Xie,, B.Liu,, and S. Y.Philip,. Review graph based online store review spammer detection. In: 2011 I.E. 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE; 2011, 1242–1247.
Wang, G, Xie, S, Liu, B, Yu, PS. Identify online store review spammers via social review graph. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2012, 3:61.
Akoglu, L, Chandy, R, Faloutsos, C. Opinion fraud detection in online reviews by network effects. In: ICWSM, vol 13; 2013, 2–11.
Ye, J, Akoglu, L. Discovering opinion spammer groups by network footprints. In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer; 2015, 267–282.
Choo, E, Yu, T, Chi, M. Detecting Opinion Spammer Groups Through Community Discovery and Sentiment Analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015, 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐20810‐7_11. ISBN: 978‐3‐319‐20810‐7.
Wang, Z, Hou, T, Song, D, Li, Z, Kong, T. Detecting review spammer groups via bipartite graph projection. Comput J 2015, 59:bxv068.
Borgelt, C. Frequent item set mining. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov 2012, 2:437–456.
Li, H, Chen, Z, Mukherjee, A, Liu, B, Shao, J. Analyzing and detecting opinion spam on a large‐scale dataset via temporal and spatial patterns. In: International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2015, 634–637.
Kaplan, AM, Haenlein, M. The early bird catches the news: nine things you should know about micro‐blogging. Bus Horiz 2011, 54:105–113.
Kaplan, AM, Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 2010, 53:59–68.
Harcup, T, O`Neill, D. What is news? Galtung and ruge revisited. J Stud 2001, 2:261–280.
Java, A, Song, X, Finin, T, Tseng, B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA‐KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis. New York, NY: ACM; 2007, 56–65.
Naaman, M, Boase, J, Lai, C‐H. Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY: ACM; 2010, 189–192.
Castillo, C, Mendoza, M, Poblete, B. Information credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM; 2011, 675–684.
Kwak, H, Lee, C, Park, H, Moon, S. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM; 2010, 591–600.
Rubin, VL, Chen, Y, Conroy, NJ. Deception detection for news: three types of fakes. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015, 52:1–4.
AlMansour, AA, Brankovic, L, Iliopoulos, CS. A model for recalibrating credibility in different contexts and languages—a twitter case study. Int J Digital Inf Wirel Commun 2014, 4:53–62.
Jin, Z, Cao, J, Jiang, Y‐G, Zhang, Y. News credibility evaluation on microblog with a hierarchical propagation model. In: 2014 I.E. International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE; 2014, 230–239.
Castillo, C, Mendoza, M, Poblete, B. Predicting information credibility in time‐sensitive social media. Internet Res 2012, 23:560–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR‐05‐2012‐0095.
Mathioudakis, M, Koudas, N. TwitterMonitor: trend detection over the Twitter stream. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. New York, NY: ACM; 2010, 1155–1158.
Bhargava, N, Sharma, G, Bhargava, R, Mathuria, M. Decision tree analysis on j48 algorithm for data mining. Proc Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 2013, 3:1114–1119.
Kang, B, O`Donovan, J, Höllerer, T. Modeling topic specific credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York, NY: ACM; 2012, 179–188.
Gupta, A, Kumaraguru, P. Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media. New York, NY: ACM; 2012, 2.
Cao, Y, Xu, J, Liu, T‐Y, Li, H, Huang, Y, Hon, H‐W. Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York, NY: ACM; 2006, 186–193.
Trotman, A. Learning to rank. Inf Retr 2005, 8:359–381.
Järvelin, K, Kekäläinen, J. Cumulated gain‐based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2002, 20:422–446.
Gupta, A, Kumaraguru, P, Castillo, C, Meier, P. Tweetcred: A real‐time Web‐based system for assessing credibility of content on Twitter. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo), Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
Galán‐Garca, P, de la Puerta, JG, Gómez, CL, Santos, I, Bringas, PG. Supervised machine learning for the detection of troll profiles in twitter social network: application to a real case of cyberbullying. In: International Joint Conference SOCO’13‐CISIS’13‐ICEUTE’13. Springer; 2014, 419–428.
Gupta, A, Kaushal, R. Improving spam detection in online social networks. In: 2015 International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Information Processing (CCIP). IEEE; 2015, 1–6.
Mendoza, M, Poblete, B, Castillo, C. Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics. New York, NY: ACM; 2010, 71–79.
Seo, E, Mohapatra, P, Abdelzaher, T. Identifying rumors and their sources in social networks. In: SPIE Defense, Security, And Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2012, 83891I–83891I.
Gupta, M, Zhao, P, Han, J. Evaluating event credibility on twitter. In: SDM. SIAM; 2012, 153–164.
Zhao, L, Hua, T, Lu, C‐T, Chen, I‐R. A topic‐focused trust model for twitter. Comput Commun 2016, 76:1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2015.08.001.
Morris, MR, Counts, S, Roseway, A, Hoff, A, Schwarz, J. Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’12, Seattle, Washington, USA. New York, NY: ACM; 2012, 441–450, ISBN 978‐1‐4503‐1086‐4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145274.
Kang, B, Höllerer, T, O`Donovan, J. Believe it or not? analyzing information credibility in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 2015. New York, NY: ACM; 2015, 611–616.
O`Donovan, J, Kang, B, Meyer, G, Höllerer, T, Adalii, S. Credibility in context: an analysis of feature distributions in twitter. In: 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE; 2012, 293–301.
Yang, J, Counts, S, Morris, MR, Hoff, A. Microblog credibility perceptions: comparing the USA and China. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY: ACM; 2013, 575–586.
Sikdar, S, Kang, B, O`Donovan, J, Höllerer, T, Adah, S. Understanding information credibility on twitter. In: 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE; 2013, 19–24.
European Commission. Flash Eurobarometer 404—TNS Political & Social. Technical Report. European Commission; 2014.
World Health Organization, Kickbusch I, Nutbeam D. Health Promotion Glossary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
Sørensen, K, Van den Broucke, S, Fullam, J, Doyle, G, Pelikan, J, Slonska, Z, Brand, H. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:1.
Stokols, D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot 1996, 10:282–298.
Chinn, D. Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis. Soc Sci Med 2011, 73:60–67.
Freeman, KS, Spyridakis, JH. An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Tech Commun 2004, 51:239–263.
Xiao, N, Sharman, R, Rao, HR, Upadhyaya, S. Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer‐related survey. Decis Support Syst 2014, 57:417–427.
De Choudhury, M, Morris, MR, White, RW. Seeking and sharing health information online: comparing search engines and social media. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2014, 1365–1376.
Li, Y, Wang, X, Lin, X, Hajli, M. Seeking and sharing health information on social media: a net valence model and cross‐cultural comparison. Technol Forecast Social Change. In press.
Metzger, MJ, Flanagin, AJ. Online Health Information Credibility. In: Thompson, TL, ed. Encyclopedia of Health Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011, 976–978.
Rice, RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of internet health information searching: multivariate results from the pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 2006, 75:8–28.
Adams, SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of web 2.0: an inter‐disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform 2010, 79:391–400.
O`Grady, L, Wathen, CN, Charnaw‐Burger, J, Betel, L, Shachak, A, Luke, R, Hockema, S, Jadad, AR. The use of tags and tag clouds to discern credible content in online health message forums. Int J Med Inform 2012, 81:36–44.
Eysenbach, G, Powell, J, Kuss, O, Sa, E‐R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002, 287:2691–2700.
Rieh, SY, Danielson, DR. Credibility: a multidisciplinary framework. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 2007, 41:307–364.
Rains, SA, Karmikel, CD. Health information‐seeking and perceptions of website credibility: examining web‐use orientation, message characteristics, and structural features of websites. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25:544–553, including the Special Issue: State of the Art Research into Cognitive Load Theory. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.005.
Ma, TJ, Atkin, D. User generated content and credibility evaluation of online health information: a meta analytic study. Telemat Inform 2016, 34:472–486.
Casaló, LV, Flavián, C, Guinalu, M. New members’ integration: key factor of success in online travel communities. J Bus Res 2013, 66:706–710.
Househ, M, Borycki, E, Kushniruk, A. Empowering patients through social media: the benefits and challenges. Health Inform J 2014, 20:50–58.
Spence, PR, Lachlan, KA, Westerman, D, Spates, SA. Where the gates matter less: ethnicity and perceived source credibility in social media health messages. Howard J Commun 2013, 24:1–16.
Syed‐Abdul, S, Fernandez‐Luque, L, Jian, W‐S, Li, Y‐C, Crain, S, Hsu, M‐H, Wang, Y‐C, Khandregzen, D, Chuluunbaatar, E, Nguyen, PA, et al. Misleading health‐related information promoted through video‐based social media: anorexia on youtube. J Med Internet Res 2013, 15:e30.
Berry, TR, Shields, C. Source attribution and credibility of health and appearance exercise advertisements: relationship with implicit and explicit attitudes and intentions. J Health Psychol 2014, 19:242–252.
Dutta‐Bergman, MJ. The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e‐health information. J Commun 2004, 54:253–269.
Oh, S, Yi, YJ, Worrall, A. Quality of health answers in social q%26a. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2012, 49:1–6.
Syn, SY, Kim, SU. The impact of source credibility on young adults’ health information activities on facebook: preliminary findings. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2013, 50:1–4.
Kwan, MYW, Arbour‐Nicitopoulos, KP, Lowe, D, Taman, S, Faulkner, GE. Student reception, sources, and believability of health‐related information. J Am Coll Health 2010, 58:555–562.
Lederman, R, Fan, H, Smith, S, Chang, S. Who can you trust? Credibility assessment in online health forums. Health Policy Technol 2014, 3:13–25.
Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954, 7:117–140.
McPherson, M, Smith‐Lovin, L, Cook, JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 2001, 27:415–444.
Abbasi, A, Fu, T, Zeng, D, Adjeroh, D. Crawling credible online medical sentiments for social intelligence. In: 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE; 2013, 254–263.
Pant, G, Srinivasan, P. Learning to crawl: comparing classification schemes. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2005, 23:430–462.
Weitzel, L, de Oliveira, JPM, Quaresma, P. Measuring the reputation in user‐generated‐content systems based on health information. Procedia Comput Sci 2014, 29:364–378.
Freeman, LC. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Netw 1978, 1:215–239.
Mukherjee, S, Weikum, G, Danescu‐Niculescu‐Mizil, C. People on drugs: credibility of user statements in health communities. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM; 2014, 65–74.