How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov

Impact Factor: 4.476

Prediction model for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection by using neighbor2vec based algorithms

Focus Article

Yuankui Cao, Junqing Fan, Hong Cao, Yunliang Chen, Jie Li, Jianxin Li, Simin Zhang

Published Online: Nov 12 2020

DOI: 10.1002/widm.1390

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract Liver cancer has become the third cause that leads to the cancer death. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as the highly malignant type of liver cancer, its recurrence rate after operation is still very high because there is no reliable clinical data to provide better advice for patients after operation. To solve the challenging issue, in this work, we design a novel prediction model for recurrence of HCC using neighbor2vec based algorithm. It consists of three stages: (a) In the preparation stage, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used to explore the independent predictors of HCC recurrence, (b) due to the low correlation between individual dimension and prediction target, K‐nearest neighbors (KNN) were found as a K‐vectors list for each patient (neighbor2vec), (c) all vectors lists were applied as the input of machine learning methods such as logistic regression, KNN, decision tree, naive Bayes (NB), and deep neural network to establish the neighbor2vec based prediction model. From the experimental results on the real data from Shandong Provincial Hospital in China, the proposed neighbor2vec based prediction model outperforms all the other models. Especially, the NB model with neighbor2vec achieves up to 83.02, 82.86, 77.6%, in terms of accuracy, recall rates, and precision. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Data Preprocessing Technologies > Classification Technologies > Machine Learning

CBOW model

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Precision under different K values

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Accuracy under different K values

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Standard deviation under different algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

FPR under different algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

TPR under different algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Precision under different algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Accuracy under different algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Flow analysis of prediction model based on neighbor2vec algorithm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Amirkhah,, R., Farazmand,, A., Gupta,, S. K., Ahmadi,, H., Wolkenhauer,, O., & Schmitz,, U. (2015). Naïve Bayes classifier predicts functional microRNA target interactions in colorectal cancer. Molecular Biosystems, 11(8), 2126–2134. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mb00245a
Boughorbel,, S., Al‐Ali,, R., & Elkum,, N. (2016). Model comparison for breast cancer prognosis based on clinical data. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146413
Bray,, F., Ferlay,, J., Soerjomataram,, I., Siegel,, R. L., Torre,, L. A., & Jemal,, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Chan,, L. W. C., Chan,, T., Cheng,, L. F., & Mak,, W. S. (2010). Machine learning of patient similarity: A case study on predicting survival in cancer patient after locoregional chemotherapy.
Chaudhary,, K., Poirion,, O. B., Lu,, L., & Garmire,, L. X. (2018). Deep learning‐based multi‐omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 24(6), 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0853
Church,, K. W. (2017). Word2Vec. Natural Language Engineering, 23(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000334
Devika,, R., Avilala,, S. V., & Subramaniyaswamy,, V. (2019). Comparative study of classifier for chronic kidney disease prediction using naive Bayes, KNN and random forest. Paper presented at the 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC).
Forner,, A., Reig,, M., & Bruix,, J. (2018). Hepatocellular carcinoma. The Lancet, 391(10127), 1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2
Friedman,, N., Geiger,, D., & Goldszmidt,, M. (1997). Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning, 29(2), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007465528199
Halazun,, K. J., Hardy,, M. A., Rana,, A. A., Woodland Iv,, D. C., Luyten,, E. J., Mahadev,, S., … Emond,, J. C. (2009). Negative impact of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Annals of Surgery, 250(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77e59
Hong,, G., Suh,, K.‐S., Suh,, S.‐W., Yoo,, T., Kim,, H., Park,, M.‐S., … Lee,, K.‐W. (2016). Alpha‐fetoprotein and (18)F‐FDG positron emission tomography predict tumor recurrence better than Milan criteria in living donor liver transplantation. Journal of Hepatology, 64(4), 852.
Ji,, F., Liang,, Y., Fu,, S.‐J., Guo,, Z.‐Y., Shu,, M., Shen,, S.‐L., … Hua,, Y.‐P. (2016). A novel and accurate predictor of survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) combined with the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet count ratio index (APRI). BMC Cancer, 16(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2189-1
Kumar,, A., & Sarkar,, B. K. (2018). A hybrid predictive model integrating C4.5 and decision table classifiers for medical data sets. Journal of Information Technology Research (JITR), 11(2), 150–167.
Lakshmi,, K., Nagesh,, Y., & Krishna,, M. V. (2014). Performance comparison of three data mining techniques for predicting kidney dialysis survivability. International Journal of Advances in Engineering %26 Technology, 7(1), 242.
Liu,, J., Xue,, Y., Ren,, K., Song,, J., Windmill,, C., & Merritt,, P. (2019). High‐performance time‐series quantitative retrieval from satellite images on a gpu cluster. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(8), 2810–2821.
Manzanarez‐Ozuna,, E., Flores,, D.‐L., Gutiérrez‐López,, E., Cervantes,, D., & Juárez,, P. (2018). Model based on GA and DNN for prediction of mRNA‐Smad7 expression regulated by miRNAs in breast cancer. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 15(1), 24–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12976-018-0095-8
Mikolov,, T., Chen,, K., Corrado,, G., & Dean,, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Computer Science.
Qin,, Z., Wang,, A. T., Zhang,, C., & Zhang,, S. (2013). Cost‐sensitive classification with k‐nearest neighbors.
Roweis,, S. T., & Saul,, L. K. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290(5500), 2323–2326. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2323
Saul,, L. K., & Rowels,, S. T. (2004). Think globally, fit locally: Unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4(2), 119–155. https://doi.org/10.1162/153244304322972667
Spelt,, L., Nilsson,, J., Andersson,, R., & Andersson,, B. (2013). Artificial neural networks – A method for prediction of survival following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 39(6), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.024
Tang,, C., Liu,, X., Li,, M., Wang,, P., Chen,, J., Wang,, L., & Li,, W. (2018a). Robust unsupervised feature selection via dual self‐representation and manifold regularization. Knowledge‐Based Systems, 145, 109–120.
Tang,, C., Zhu,, X., Liu,, X., Li,, M., Wang,, P., Zhang,, C., & Wang,, L. (2018b). Learning a joint affinity graph for multiview subspace clustering. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(7), 1724–1736.
Tseng,, W.‐T., Chiang,, W.‐F., Liu,, S.‐Y., Roan,, J., & Lin,, C.‐N. (2015). The application of data mining techniques to oral cancer prognosis. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0241-3
Turkki,, R., Byckhov,, D., Lundin,, M., Isola,, J., Nordling,, S., Kovanen,, P. E., … Lundin,, J. (2019). Breast cancer outcome prediction with tumour tissue images and machine learning. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 177(1), 41–52.
Wang,, M., Wang,, L., Ye,, Z., & Yang,, J. (2019). Ant lion optimizer for texture classification: A moving convolutional mask. IEEE Access, 7, 61697–61705.
Zhang,, S., Li,, X., Zong,, M., Zhu,, X., & Cheng,, D. (2017). Learning k for kNN Classification. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 8(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2990508
Zhang,, S., Li,, X., Zong,, M., Zhu,, X., & Wang,, R. (2018). Efficient kNN classification with different numbers of nearest neighbors. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(5), 1774–1785. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2673241
Zhang,, Y., Liu,, G., Liu,, A., Zhang,, Y., Li,, Z., Zhang,, X., & Li,, Q. (2020). Personalized geographical influence modeling for POI recommendation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 35(5), 18–27.

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts