This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
Impact Factor: 6.846

Regulation of mRNA decapping

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract Decapping is a critical step in the control of mRNA stability and the regulation of gene expression. Two major decapping enzymes involved in mRNA turnover have been identified, each functioning in one of the two exonucleolytic mRNA decay pathways in eukaryotic cells. The Dcp2 protein cleaves capped mRNA and initiates 5′ to 3′ degradation; the scavenger decapping enzyme, DcpS, hydrolyzes the cap structure generated by the 3′ to 5′ decay pathway. Consistent with the important role of decapping in gene expression, cap hydrolysis is exquisitely controlled by multiple regulators that influence association with the cap and the catalytic step. In this review, we will discuss the functions of the two different decapping enzymes, their regulation by cis‐elements and trans‐factors, and the potential role of the decapping enzymes in human neurological disorders. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Regulation of RNA Stability

mRNA 5′ to 3′ decay pathway. Following deadenylation, the 5′ cap of an mRNA is cleaved by the Dcp2 decapping enzyme and the resulting 5′‐end monophosphorylated mRNA is degraded by the Xrn1 exoribonuclease. Known positive (indicated by the plus sign) and negative (indicated by the minus sign) regulators of Dcp2 are listed.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Models demonstrating activation of Dcp2 decapping by cis‐elements. (a) Activation of Dcp2 decapping by an AU‐rich element (ARE) element is shown. TTP, key component in ARE‐mediated decay, interacts with the decapping complex and promotes decapping of the ARE‐containing mRNA. (b) Activation of Dcp2 decapping by a 3′ end U‐tract is represented. The U‐tract at the 3′ terminus of an mRNA is recognized by the Lsm1–7 complex to recruit a decapping complex. (c) Activation of Dcp2 decapping by a 5′ end stem‐loop structure. mRNAs containing a stem‐loop structure [Dcp2 binding and decapping element (DBDE)] within the first 10 nucleotides at the 5′ end can more efficiently recruit the Dcp2 protein to stimulate decapping.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Model of DcpS decapping cycle. The ligand‐free DcpS dimer shown at the top exhibits a symmetric open conformation with two binding sites for cap structure. With high substrate concentrations (middle), both cap‐binding sites could be occupied as shown. A conformational change occurs to close the N terminus on one of the substrates to create a simultaneous closed and open conformation. Following substrate hydrolysis at the closed site, a conformational change occurs to release the decapping products and the site can be occupied by another substrate to start a new catalytic cycle. Under low substrate concentration, only one of the sites would be expected to be occupied by cap structure. The N terminus at a cap bound site closes for substrate hydrolysis followed by release of the m7Gp and ppN decapping products to complete a catalytic cycle. (See Liu et al.30 for a more thorough kinetic description).

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Schematic and structural representation of the DcpS decapping protein. The human DcpS protein is schematically represented at the top with the Histidine Triad (HIT) fold and HIT motif regions as described in the text denoted. Crystal structure of the human DcpS homodimer bound to two m7GpppG cap structures generated by PyMOL from PDB#1ST0 is shown on the bottom. The two monomers of DcpS are shown in cyan and green, respectively. One monomer (cyan) forms the closed active conformation while the second monomer (green) forms the open inactive conformation. The m7GpppG cap structures are represented in red.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Schematic and structural representation of the Dcp2 decapping protein. The human Dcp2 protein is schematically represented at the top with the evolutionarily conserved domains as described in the text noted. Crystal structure of the N‐terminal fragment of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Dcp2 (residues 1–266) generated by PyMOL from PDB#2A6T, is shown on the bottom. Conserved regions are highlighted in the same color scheme as the schematic representation above.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

mRNA 3′ to 5′ decay pathway. Following removal of the poly(A) tail, the mRNA can be degraded from the 3′ end by the exosome complex. The resulting cap structure of capped oligonucleotides less than 10 bases long is hydrolyzed by the DcpS scavenger decapping enzyme. Several cellular processes that can be influenced by DcpS are indicated. DcpS is a potential negatively modulator of SMN2 expression16 and it positively regulates 5′ to 3′ exonucleolytic degradation (at least in yeast17) and cap‐proximal pre‐mRNA splicing.18.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Mechanisms of deadenylation‐dependent decay
Structural and functional insights into eukaryotic mRNA decapping

Browse by Topic

RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms
RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Regulation of RNA Stability

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts